Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
28. Have a nice, big dose of reality, with your radiation, Baggins
Mon Jun 16, 2014, 10:07 PM
Jun 2014
http://atomicbombmuseum.org/3_health.shtml


  • Even now, after over half a century later, many aftereffects remain: leukemia,
    A-bomb cataracts, and cancers of thyroid, breast, lungs, salivary glands, birth defects, including mental retardation, and fears of birth defects in their children, plus, of course, the disfiguring keloid scars.


    ****************

    —Radiation injury penetrates deeply into human body and injures cells, and thus molecules, resulting in cell death, inhibited cell division, abnormalities of intracellular molecules and membranes.

    **********

    —Actively regenerating and proliferating cells are most sensitive to radiation, e.g., young blood cells, lymphocytes, spermatogonia (of testicles), follicle cells (of ovaries) are most sensitive; next are mucosal epithelial cells of the mouth, the esophagus, and stomach, and epithelial cells of the eye lens, and cells forming the hair bulb. (Note: epithelial tissues cover surfaces or line cavities, as well as perform various secreting, transporting, or regulatory functions.)

    **************************

    By 1975 a total of 1,838 cases were diagnosed as leukemia in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Of these, 512 were exposed within 10 km from ground zero. Incidence peaked in 1951-52 in both cities. THAT'S 28 YEARS LATER.


    4. Cancers

  • Thyroid: first case reported in 1957. High incidence among females. Some cases first discovered by autopsy. THAT'S 10 YEARS AFTER

  • Breast: cases much higher among those exposed than in non-exposed. Exposure to 100 rads or more made risk 3.3 times that of those unexposed. Peak incidence was found higher among women ages 20-30.

  • Lung: First case noted in Hiroshima in 1954, with 37 cases in Nagasaki soon added. A 1972 large-scale survey revealed 3,778 lung cancers in 10,412 deaths, with correlation of high risks to high radiation dosage.

    5. Chromosome changes

    Chromosomes are present in constant numbers in the nuclei of cells, and can be seen as visible entities during cell division. The count in humans is a constant 46. Chromosome aberrations were first noted in exposed survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1960. Subsequent systematic surveys revealed a high frequency of aberrations in blood cells and lymphocytes in fetuses exposed to large radiation doses in utero (in the womb) or soon after birth.

    Although chromosome aberrations increased with higher radiation doses, frequency of aberrations was consistently high at all dose ranges. As late as 1985, chromosomal aberrations in somatic (body) cells persisted among exposed survivors.

    6. Exposure in utero and microcephaly

    A Nagasaki survey of 98 pregnant women exposed at a distance of 2.0 km from ground zero and 113 pregnant women exposed at 4.0 and 5.0 km from ground zero, showed a high percentage of neonatal and infantile deaths for those exposed within a 2.0 km range, as well as signs of acute radiation illness such as loss of hair, bleeding tendency, and inner mouth lesions. Mental retardation was noted in 25% of newborn survivors.

    Besides high mortality rates, retarded growth and development was also indicated. Most notable in those exposed within 1.0–5.0 km of ground zero were retarded stature, underweight, and smaller head circumference, a condition called microcephaly, one of the most pathetic aftereffects of the atomic bombings, especially when accompanied by mental retardation.

    ************************************

    7. Genetic surveys

    Genetic surveys have not yielded positive evidence of genetic hazards due to atomic bomb radiation. Even so, possible A-bomb-induced effects such as spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, congenital malformations, and more, require continued study.
  • Recommendations

    0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

    Fukushima's Children are Dying [View all] unhappycamper Jun 2014 OP
    Before the nay-sayers post, I want to emphasize Demeter Jun 2014 #1
    He's no journalist when it comes to anything nuclear FBaggins Jun 2014 #3
    So are you saying this is made up? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #6
    Yes... he made it up entirely FBaggins Jun 2014 #7
    Here's some actual reporting for comparison FBaggins Jun 2014 #9
    That's really interesting. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #11
    Nobody can say for certain... FBaggins Jun 2014 #15
    Half of almost any group having what I would think of as medical Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #17
    True... but you have to ask yourself... FBaggins Jun 2014 #18
    Especially when this is the SECOND time Japan has suffered massive irradiation, you mean? Demeter Jun 2014 #20
    Lol... nice try. Let's play a game. FBaggins Jun 2014 #22
    From the website: Children of the Atomic Bomb Demeter Jun 2014 #23
    So...um... that's 6-0 in my favor, eh? FBaggins Jun 2014 #24
    BUT--the Fukushima disaster is the gift that keeps on giving Demeter Jun 2014 #25
    Sorry... you don't get to play games with reality. FBaggins Jun 2014 #27
    Have a nice, big dose of reality, with your radiation, Baggins Demeter Jun 2014 #28
    Lol... was that an oddly-worded apology? Or did you not even read what you posted? FBaggins Jun 2014 #29
    You can't prove a negative Demeter Jun 2014 #30
    Sorry... you've confused your logical fallacies. FBaggins Jun 2014 #31
    You are a nuclear apologist, and there's far too much to apologize for Demeter Jun 2014 #32
    How predictable FBaggins Jun 2014 #37
    For three years Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #2
    In order for the talking point to go away... FBaggins Jun 2014 #4
    'Dose' also has a time component. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #5
    That's incorrect FBaggins Jun 2014 #8
    You've got it exactly backwards. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #10
    Nope. FBaggins Jun 2014 #12
    Ah, ok Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #14
    No problem at all FBaggins Jun 2014 #16
    Actually looking at what you said, I think we Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #13
    I don't see any info that a child has actually died from Fukishima. OnlinePoker Jun 2014 #19
    Cancer takes a while. Check back in ten years. Demeter Jun 2014 #21
    Nothing to see here...move along. deathrind Jun 2014 #26
    This is horrible that so many children are dying. We must get rid of nuclear power plants for good. WilliamTuckness Jun 2014 #33
    Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #34
    Fukushima: Another Disaster The Nuclear/Radiation Cartel Lies About Wo49 Jun 2014 #35
    You're going to use your very first post to shill for the lunatic fringe? FBaggins Jun 2014 #36
    Welcome to D.U., Wo49. We are clearly deeply disrespected by the corporate "news" media. n/t Judi Lynn Jun 2014 #38
    Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Fukushima's Children are ...»Reply #28