Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

hatrack

(64,825 posts)
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 11:02 AM Jun 2014

Unrelenting Population Growth Driving Mass Extinctions, Rapid Climate Breakdown [View all]


Human population growth over the last 12,000 years. Population has exploded since around 1500.

It took humans around 200,000 years to reach a global population of one billion. But, in two hundred years we've septupled that. In fact, over the last 40 years we've added an extra billion approximately every dozen years. And the United Nations predicts we'll add another four billion—for a total of 11 billion—by century's end. Despite this few scientists, policymakers, or even environmentalists are willing to publicly connect incredible population growth to worsening climate change, biodiversity loss, resource scarcity, or the global environmental crisis in general.

"We are already to a point where our population size is unsustainable," Jeffrey McKee with the Ohio State University told mongabay.com. "In other words, we are already beyond the point of the biological concept of 'carrying capacity.' Millions of people go hungry every day, and an unfathomable number don’t even have access to clean drinking water. A world of 11 billion people would be regrettable to humans as well as to other species."

McKee has recently studied the intersection between human population and biodiversity decline, finding a direct correlation between the rate of population growth and the number of endangered species in a country. Meanwhile another researcher, geographer Camila Mora with the University of Hawaii, recently argued in a paper in Ecology and Society that overpopulation was exacerbating global warming, the biodiversity crisis, as well as creating large-scale economic and societal problems.

But if our population is already beyond sustainable, why has the subject become almost taboo? And not just in political circles, but even in environmental circles? "There are multiple reasons including historical flip-flops about [overpopulation's] importance," Mora told mongabay.com. "However, the fact that were are not interested in talking about it it does not make less critical."

Ed. - emphasis added.

EDIT

http://news.mongabay.com/2014/0626-hance-overpopulation-climate-biodiversity.html
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Indeed, reminds me of the messages of the Georgia Guidestones: NYC_SKP Jun 2014 #1
I'd never heard of that. Very interesting. CrispyQ Jun 2014 #3
Thanks--I hadn't known about the Guidestones. Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 #5
Responsible Population Parameters colsohlibgal Jun 2014 #6
A quiver of children Fairgo Jun 2014 #28
Population growth is an chervilant Jun 2014 #2
It will balance out Fearless Jun 2014 #4
"Nature" doesn't really care about the biosphere either. Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 #7
Within the species it does care about those things Fearless Jun 2014 #17
If we've added 4 billion in the last 40 years and it's going to take us 86 years tularetom Jun 2014 #8
The problem is solving itself Fearless Jun 2014 #18
The root cause of our biggest problems. earthside Jun 2014 #9
yep. Well said......and KnR to this whole thread BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #21
Republicans have a solution. Free market, law of the jungle, everyone for themselves! Dustlawyer Jun 2014 #10
People aren't hungry or thirsty because hughee99 Jun 2014 #11
Money issue too. It's very complicated. But let's distribute condoms along with all that food. Auggie Jun 2014 #12
I think of what you describe as somewhat different - the first of two speed bumps, if you will hatrack Jun 2014 #13
The OP suggested we've already gone beyond our resources because so many hughee99 Jun 2014 #14
Carrying capacity is based on sustainability pscot Jun 2014 #20
Fossil feuls? hughee99 Jun 2014 #22
At present, other sources of energy pscot Jun 2014 #25
I think we're defining things differently hughee99 Jun 2014 #27
Other energy sources are less dense, non-portable, and don't provide raw materials. Spider Jerusalem Jun 2014 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #16
Bingo! nolabels Jun 2014 #15
This, as more and more animals keep taking the brunt of feeding so many more billions of people gtar100 Jun 2014 #19
0ut of control population growth kardonb Jun 2014 #23
Why can't we talk about it? BrotherIvan Jun 2014 #24
But what's the human to non-human ratio history? Humans are replacing other species. valerief Jun 2014 #26
The old Petri dish is filling up ... Nihil Jun 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Unrelenting Population Gr...»Reply #0