Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

colsohlibgal

(5,276 posts)
6. Responsible Population Parameters
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 12:10 PM
Jun 2014

I've always thought that people who have 7,8, 9 or more children are being pretty irresponsible. I've never understood the need, at least in this century, to do that. I had two and had no desire to have more.

We of course need to reproduce so we don't die out, but it would seem necessary and prudent not to go overboard. There is not an endless supply of resources, at least till we get to a time where we find other places in the solar system to live.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Indeed, reminds me of the messages of the Georgia Guidestones: NYC_SKP Jun 2014 #1
I'd never heard of that. Very interesting. CrispyQ Jun 2014 #3
Thanks--I hadn't known about the Guidestones. Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 #5
Responsible Population Parameters colsohlibgal Jun 2014 #6
A quiver of children Fairgo Jun 2014 #28
Population growth is an chervilant Jun 2014 #2
It will balance out Fearless Jun 2014 #4
"Nature" doesn't really care about the biosphere either. Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 #7
Within the species it does care about those things Fearless Jun 2014 #17
If we've added 4 billion in the last 40 years and it's going to take us 86 years tularetom Jun 2014 #8
The problem is solving itself Fearless Jun 2014 #18
The root cause of our biggest problems. earthside Jun 2014 #9
yep. Well said......and KnR to this whole thread BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #21
Republicans have a solution. Free market, law of the jungle, everyone for themselves! Dustlawyer Jun 2014 #10
People aren't hungry or thirsty because hughee99 Jun 2014 #11
Money issue too. It's very complicated. But let's distribute condoms along with all that food. Auggie Jun 2014 #12
I think of what you describe as somewhat different - the first of two speed bumps, if you will hatrack Jun 2014 #13
The OP suggested we've already gone beyond our resources because so many hughee99 Jun 2014 #14
Carrying capacity is based on sustainability pscot Jun 2014 #20
Fossil feuls? hughee99 Jun 2014 #22
At present, other sources of energy pscot Jun 2014 #25
I think we're defining things differently hughee99 Jun 2014 #27
Other energy sources are less dense, non-portable, and don't provide raw materials. Spider Jerusalem Jun 2014 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #16
Bingo! nolabels Jun 2014 #15
This, as more and more animals keep taking the brunt of feeding so many more billions of people gtar100 Jun 2014 #19
0ut of control population growth kardonb Jun 2014 #23
Why can't we talk about it? BrotherIvan Jun 2014 #24
But what's the human to non-human ratio history? Humans are replacing other species. valerief Jun 2014 #26
The old Petri dish is filling up ... Nihil Jun 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Unrelenting Population Gr...»Reply #6