Environment & Energy

tblue37

(68,360 posts)

18. It is the same as the appeal of looking at nude pics of women who don't want

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 11:02 AM

Sep 2014

them made public. There are endless quantities of nude pics of women who are quite willing to have their pictures viewed, and plenty of bare breasts for men to ogle. But the thrill for them is in peeking at and invading the privacy of women who do NOT want to be ogled and leered at by strangers.

It is about the desire to humiliate, shame, and degrade women, not about the desire to view their body or parts of their body naked.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

And Pretty Much The Whole Thing In A Nutshell . . . . [View all] hatrack Sep 2014 OP

Do not forget "hot babies" and fugitive hunts, no time for climate change shit or reporting on Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #1

Or fugitives hunting for "hot babes". Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #13

Thank You ...great post....no text... Stuart G Sep 2014 #2

knr pscot Sep 2014 #3

K&RRRRR! GliderGuider Sep 2014 #4

+1 progressoid Sep 2014 #5

For fuckin real . toby jo Sep 2014 #6

If they actually reported on the science of GMO's... ag_dude Sep 2014 #7

Very few on here deny the dangers of GMOs GliderGuider Sep 2014 #10

No, it's not, I'm referring to the overwhelming scientific evidence that... ag_dude Sep 2014 #15

I guess Monsanto needs to improve its outreach programs then... nt GliderGuider Sep 2014 #19

I said GMOs, I didn't say a single thing about Monsanto ag_dude Sep 2014 #21

Most people are happily stuffing down the GMO everything. GliderGuider Sep 2014 #22

You act as if I'm the one that made the original graphic. ag_dude Sep 2014 #23

I completely agree with the OP - I'm just responding to your comment about science. GliderGuider Sep 2014 #24

Because of who funds the research? ag_dude Sep 2014 #25

So how do you turn public trust around? GliderGuider Sep 2014 #27

Report on the actual science. ag_dude Sep 2014 #29

We don't trust the reported science in this area. GliderGuider Sep 2014 #30

I realize that, there's no hope for people like you ag_dude Sep 2014 #31

When Big Corporations like Novartis and Monsanto outright truedelphi Sep 2014 #32

Ignore those studies then... ag_dude Sep 2014 #33

truedelphi just pointed you to a different result. GliderGuider Sep 2014 #34

I understand red flags ag_dude Sep 2014 #35

Insulting people always helps your case. GliderGuider Sep 2014 #36

I'm not lashing out at anything ag_dude Sep 2014 #38

IMO you are drawing a false equivalency GliderGuider Sep 2014 #39

It's stunning how far people go to protect and promote their poison. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #40

It's human nature. The more we have to protect, the more protective we become. nt GliderGuider Sep 2014 #42

Then why do we not protect nature, instead protecting poisoners like Monsatan? Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #44

There's your problem, it's science not "corporate" ag_dude Sep 2014 #41

Any time a corporation's profits depend on a particular aspect of science GliderGuider Sep 2014 #43

Science vs science denying ideology ag_dude Sep 2014 #46

The ag chemicals are made from?...............oil. More oil creates more climate change. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #45

You do know that Bt plants... ag_dude Sep 2014 #47

Although now there are super pests because of the chemicals leading to more pests, Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #48

I see that you don't actually know what Bt is. ag_dude Sep 2014 #49

So I wouldn't have to spend extra money buying bt and spraying it. Good. BUT, there is jtuck004 Sep 2014 #54

How many more decades of research do you need? ag_dude Sep 2014 #56

? I'm not disagreeing, but who funded those studies? If it was the people jtuck004 Sep 2014 #62

I see you don't get the dangers of GMO, to the earth, the creatures and humans. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #60

Snarky replies that are unfortunately the norm for the anti-GMO crowd ag_dude Sep 2014 #61

A large amount of snark comes from the pro-GMO crowd as well. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #63

I'm talking about you specifically. ag_dude Sep 2014 #64

A few facts Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #65

You didn't link to a single scientific paper, which is typical of the anti-GMO crowd ag_dude Sep 2014 #66

Nor did you Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #67

Do you really need a link to a scientific paper on what Bt crops are for? ag_dude Sep 2014 #68

I think you're partially wrong here... druidity33 Sep 2014 #58

This message was self-deleted by its author ag_dude Sep 2014 #59

For myself, the issue isn't the science but how it is being used. Maedhros Sep 2014 #50

That's a fair crticism ag_dude Sep 2014 #51

There is a flaw in the graphic proReality Sep 2014 #8

Amen.... daleanime Sep 2014 #16

Not owning a TV, and so not watching what passes for SheilaT Sep 2014 #9

That about says it all! mountain grammy Sep 2014 #11

We learn a lot about "side boobs," too. nt tblue37 Sep 2014 #12

I do not get the appeal of side boob shots at all. marble falls Sep 2014 #17

It is the same as the appeal of looking at nude pics of women who don't want tblue37 Sep 2014 #18

Its a nasty business that needs jail time associated with it. marble falls Sep 2014 #20

saw this on FB hfojvt Sep 2014 #14

Kick high! valerief Sep 2014 #26

It sounds good The2ndWheel Sep 2014 #28

The media serves to protect the interests of their owners, the 1% blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #37

Proud to be K&R #100 n/t Oldtimeralso Sep 2014 #52

K & R Iliyah Sep 2014 #53

Any Panda news? They are so cute when they are young. n/t jtuck004 Sep 2014 #55

Kick.. thanks hatrack Cha Sep 2014 #57