Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

2naSalit

(101,762 posts)

3. Very thought-inducing points.

Reply to GliderGuider (Original post)

Mon Oct 6, 2014, 11:52 AM

Oct 2014

I need to digest this a bit, some other options are developing in my work-weary mind right now so I can't quickly respond with the poignancy this topic and points made respectfully require. I will ponder this a bit and respond soon. For now I'll just kick to keep it circulation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is democracy compatible with de-growth? [View all] GliderGuider Oct 2014 OP

Alas. Totally agree with your post Bigmack Oct 2014 #1

The most important aspect of "de-growth" is in reducing the total population. Jackpine Radical Oct 2014 #2

Very thought-inducing points. 2naSalit Oct 2014 #3

Universal education of women has led to population declines on point Oct 2014 #4

Dictatorships did address (if not reverse) excessive growth in both Edo Japan and China GliderGuider Oct 2014 #5

would dictatorships really reduce growth? DonCoquixote Oct 2014 #6

Not necessarily. GliderGuider Oct 2014 #7

We have to break our stereotype that a growing economy is good... ffr Oct 2014 #8

Growth is easy. Everyone gets more. Hooray! The2ndWheel Oct 2014 #10

Even an authoritarian government needs to grow to be effective The2ndWheel Oct 2014 #9

That's one of the things that derailed China's OCP. GliderGuider Oct 2014 #11

Communites that successfully implement "degrowth" do not show up in the history books. hunter Oct 2014 #12

I agree that political labels have little relevance. GliderGuider Oct 2014 #13

Interesting question, GliderGuider. I suspect a sufficient number of citizens are right now Hortensis Oct 2014 #14

There were some improvements, in our own power plants for example... hunter Oct 2014 #18

You make a good argument for population control madokie Oct 2014 #15

The arguments are sound, but arguments don't carry the day on this issue. GliderGuider Oct 2014 #16

Like seeking volunteers for the Soylent factory One_Life_To_Give Oct 2014 #17

The only experience we have of actual degrowth pscot Oct 2014 #19

Wealthy elites are less concerned about AGW than the public cprise Oct 2014 #20

What major developed nations are neither oligarchic nor authoritarian? GliderGuider Oct 2014 #21