Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
9. Can't argue too much with that
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 12:10 PM
Oct 2014

Kill someone, and get away with it, that's ok. You earned freedom by not getting caught. Kill someone, but get caught, that's ok too, because whoever built the prison earned the right to make the rules and put you in prison if that prison is still standing.

We're the only species that thinks twice about whatever it that we call killing. Whether it's within our species, or outside of it. To the vast majority of life, killing is just evolution. It's just surviving. Then again, if humanity exterminates Ebola one day, that's just evolution. Same thing if it kills all of us at some point, in some way. Just using Ebola for the sake of argument. It can be anything though.

Literally anything that happens is ok, it just gets clouded by our particular moral judgments. At least these days, since as you point out, nobody really gave a damn back in the day, for various reasons. Of course, if people have moral judgments today, that's ok, whatever those may be. How could a moral argument not exist if they do exist?

I like it. What you're saying is reality. It's completely messy. Even the words that we're using to describe what you're talking about don't do it justice. These are just words that we made up and defined. How much more subjective can you get than that? Which I guess is ok, even if it's limiting.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Should we upgrade photosy...»Reply #9