Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Viking12

(6,012 posts)
15. 0.1%-0.15% is significant?
Sun Oct 12, 2014, 04:55 PM
Oct 2014

According to your source, "Using a trans-polar route may reduce global CO2 emissions from ships by roughly 0.1 % in 2030 and 0.15 % in 2030 and 2050, respectively" (p.19).


and...what about this? "Based on certain assumptions about hydrocarbon reserves in the Arctic and their development and an oil price of $80/boe, CO2 emissions from shipping related to oil and gas production (tankers and service vessels) in the Arctic was estimated to be 40 % higher than the CO2 emissions from Arctic transit traffic in 2030 and about twice that from transit traffic in 2050" (p.19).

In other words, the tiny reduction in emissions via shipping will be overwhelmed by the emissions from increased carbon production in the Arctic.

Fail.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Good news on Climate Chan...»Reply #15