Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,875 posts)
15. I don't think so
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:06 AM
Oct 2014

Fusion would be safer than Fission.

Fission, happens spontaneously. In a fission based power plant, operators bring a bunch of radioactive material together, a chain reaction occurs, and then try to control it. If they lose control of it, it can melt down.

Fission produces long-lasting radioactive waste.

Fusion, happens naturally in the center of stars, but, elsewhere it is kind of difficult to keep going. (We've been working on it for decades.) If we lose control of it, it stops.

Fusion will produce smaller amounts, of shorter lived waste.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Scientists skeptical of L...»Reply #15