Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
3. Neither is a "fix" much less a quick one...
Thu Oct 30, 2014, 08:28 AM
Oct 2014

there is no easy way to reduce human consumption and the Chinese have shown that there is no easy way to reduce population.

It's interesting to note that in the US, Europe and Japan, increasing wealth seems to track with fewer children, but also with increasing consumption, while less wealth tracks with more children but less consumption. Don't need arguing academics to see that happening.

And wars, famine, plague or whatever may reduce the population temporarily, but it bounces back as soon as the situation changes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»A rebuttal to " Huma...»Reply #3