Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
14. No doubt wind and solar are making some inroads in Europe.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 10:57 PM
Nov 2014

Europe's total primary energy consumption in 2011 was about 2.2 TW (1620 MTOE at 12 million MWh per MTOE, divided by 8760 for converting TWh to TW).

Electrical generation provided ~350 GW (3,000,000 GWh / 8760). According to their numbers, renewable energy, including wood which represents half of that energy, supplied 85 GW (750,000 GWh, / 8760).

350 GW of electricity represents 16% of Europe's primary energy consumption, and the renewable portion represents 4% of primary energy. Boosting the proportion of electricity from renewables by 5% would give it an additional 0.8% share of the primary energy total. That's not enough of a change to have contributed much to the 8% drop in CO2 emissions since 2005.

Since Europe's constant-dollar GDP has been static since 2006, the majority of the drop appears to have come from a shift in the GDP makeup. Europe's Gross Fixed Capital Formation has fallen by 11% since then, mirroring the decline in the CO2 intensity of their GDP. This means that more of their GDP is coming from services like finance...

Gross fixed capital formation includes land improvements; plant, machinery, and equipment purchases; and the construction of roads, railways, and the like, including schools, offices, hospitals, private residential dwellings, and commercial and industrial buildings.

All GDP-related data was sourced from the World Bank.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I guess it's early yet. NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #1
Oh goodie. That means I can continue my carless fossil fuel based lifestyle ffr Nov 2014 #2
No, it doesn’t OKIsItJustMe Nov 2014 #3
One facet wouldn't convince me ffr Nov 2014 #4
This finding may mean the difference between “hopeless” and “serious” OKIsItJustMe Nov 2014 #5
I'd love to believe that, but what meaningful action is being taken ffr Nov 2014 #6
How about on a national scale? OKIsItJustMe Nov 2014 #7
Is that because CO2 is so scrupulous at respecting national borders? GliderGuider Nov 2014 #8
The question “what meaningful action is being taken on a mass scale” was asked. OKIsItJustMe Nov 2014 #9
And you point to G20 promises? GliderGuider Nov 2014 #10
Go back and look at the graphs. OKIsItJustMe Nov 2014 #11
It looks to me like the European graph mostly shows them running into economic trouble. GliderGuider Nov 2014 #12
No doubt economics played a role OKIsItJustMe Nov 2014 #13
No doubt wind and solar are making some inroads in Europe. GliderGuider Nov 2014 #14
Perhaps you missed the title of the first graph OKIsItJustMe Nov 2014 #15
No, I didn't miss it. GliderGuider Nov 2014 #16
After a little more digging, I'm convinced that graph is pure bullshit. GliderGuider Nov 2014 #17
This may be helpful to you OKIsItJustMe Nov 2014 #18
So they just lopped off over 1/3 of all primary energy use with the stroke of a pen. GliderGuider Nov 2014 #19
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»NASA: Alaska Shows No Sig...»Reply #14