Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(20,282 posts)
18. Because piping enough water to make a dent would require insane amounts of energy we don't have
Wed Dec 31, 2014, 04:06 PM
Dec 2014

By God, you'd have to pipe it OVER the Rocky Mountains! Even the lowest passes through them are a MILE of vertical elevation change from the Great Lakes or anywhere else east of Iowa or Nebraska. I suppose we could build a few dozen gigawatt-sized nuclear reactors in a chain across the Midwest and Southwest, all dedicated solely to pumping water

The same concept mostly applies to desalination plants on the cost: to make enough water to make a difference in the drought would require so many plants, consuming so much energy, that it would bankrupt the state of California trying to do such a thing.

People don't seem to understand the scale of how much water we consume in this country. We have this idea that since we can move millions of barrels of oil a day, we could simply do the same with water. What few seem to consider is that the amount of water we consume absolutely dwarfs the amount of water we consume daily. The water directly consumed by us, the stuff coming out of our taps, is tiny compared to the water we don't see: the water we use for agriculture and industry. A desal. plant can supply a city's drinking water needs, but not come close to supplying the farms and factories that support the economy that city is based upon.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's been so bad.... daleanime Dec 2014 #1
the ripple effect should be considered as the fruit basket being empty. hollysmom Dec 2014 #2
And the obvious answer is grow the stuff someplace else but that would be very bad for the jwirr Dec 2014 #6
I'm in SoCal, it snowed last night. Trillo Dec 2014 #3
Let's not forget hydroelectric power generation, either. ColesCountyDem Dec 2014 #4
Instead of a Keystone pipeline, why not a water pipeline? iscooterliberally Dec 2014 #5
I live on the Great Lakes and every now and then someone suggests something like that - I don't jwirr Dec 2014 #7
I agree that there would be a huge fight about it. iscooterliberally Dec 2014 #8
Happy New Year. Hope we can all get something done this year on some of these issues. jwirr Dec 2014 #10
They are already moving here... americannightmare Dec 2014 #9
I doubt native Californians will move east. upaloopa Dec 2014 #12
Hey! Land in Detroit is cheap - could be the new silicon valley! hollysmom Dec 2014 #14
I have always liked Detroit. upaloopa Dec 2014 #16
Why pipe it from somewhere else? Why not just produce it? eggplant Dec 2014 #13
I was just throwing ideas around. Desalinization sounds good. iscooterliberally Dec 2014 #17
found this article from earlier this year eggplant Dec 2014 #19
Because piping enough water to make a dent would require insane amounts of energy we don't have NickB79 Dec 2014 #18
A few weeks ago there was a post here on upaloopa Dec 2014 #11
well, people have been working on causing this drought for a long time hollysmom Dec 2014 #15
Here's one from a week ago OnlinePoker Dec 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»California Droughts Could...»Reply #18