Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)
8. Sigh... yet another malthusian knee-jerk
Thu Jan 15, 2015, 02:03 PM
Jan 2015

Show a malthusian a graph of any resource or commodity that hits a new high and then retreats... and he'll tell you why that was actually a "peak" that represents an immutable maximum. It hasn't fallen because of falling demand caused by global economic weakness... it's because we've hit the limit for how much can be produced and it's all downhill from here.

When new highs are put in a few yeas later, he insists that he wasn't "wrong"... he was "early" and the new high is just even more unsustainable production that will make the eventual collapse that much worse.

And in this case it isn't even always an actual decline... just a decline in the rate of growth. Which, to the malthusian, is just as good as proving a peak - since the only contrary position that they'll admit exists is a "cornucopian" strawman that believes in only exponential growth without limits.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Sustainability Crisis: Re...»Reply #8