Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Leading Bird Conservation Group Formally Petitions Feds to Regulate Wind Industry [View all]OKIsItJustMe
(21,875 posts)6. Audubon's Position on Wind Power
http://policy.audubon.org/wind-power-overview-0
[font face="Times, Serif"][font size="5"]Wind Power Overview[/font]
[font size="4"]Audubon's Position on Wind Power[/font]
Summary: Audubon strongly supports properly-sited wind power as a clean alternative energy source that reduces the threat of global warming. Wind power facilities should be planned, sited and operated to minimize negative impacts on bird and wildlife populations.
Protecting Birds and Wildlife: While Audubon strongly supports wind power and recognizes it will not be without some impact, production and transmission facilities must be planned, sited and operated in concert with other actions needed to minimize and mitigate their impacts on birds and other wildlife populations. Several federal and state laws require this and the long-term sustainability of the wind industry depends on it. Wind power facilities impact birds from direct collisions with turbines and related facilities, such as power lines. Wind power facilities can also degrade or destroy habitat, cause disturbance and displacement, and disrupt important ecological links. These impacts can be avoided or significantly reduced, however, with proper siting, operation and mitigation.
Audubon supports the adoption of federal and state guidelines on the study, siting, operation and mitigation of wind power. Guidelines should provide developers, permitting agencies and conservation groups with the legal, technical and practical steps needed to minimize impacts on birds and other wildlife. Guidelines should provide the following essential elements:
[/font]
[font size="4"]Audubon's Position on Wind Power[/font]
Summary: Audubon strongly supports properly-sited wind power as a clean alternative energy source that reduces the threat of global warming. Wind power facilities should be planned, sited and operated to minimize negative impacts on bird and wildlife populations.
Protecting Birds and Wildlife: While Audubon strongly supports wind power and recognizes it will not be without some impact, production and transmission facilities must be planned, sited and operated in concert with other actions needed to minimize and mitigate their impacts on birds and other wildlife populations. Several federal and state laws require this and the long-term sustainability of the wind industry depends on it. Wind power facilities impact birds from direct collisions with turbines and related facilities, such as power lines. Wind power facilities can also degrade or destroy habitat, cause disturbance and displacement, and disrupt important ecological links. These impacts can be avoided or significantly reduced, however, with proper siting, operation and mitigation.
Audubon supports the adoption of federal and state guidelines on the study, siting, operation and mitigation of wind power. Guidelines should provide developers, permitting agencies and conservation groups with the legal, technical and practical steps needed to minimize impacts on birds and other wildlife. Guidelines should provide the following essential elements:
- Minimum pre-permitting study requirements and guidance on study methods, frequency and acceptable data sources to ensure that wind power is sited in appropriate locations
- Clearly delineated siting criteria that designate areas where wind power should not be allowed, such as Important Bird Areas, major migratory corridors, wilderness areas, national parks, wildlife refuges, and other sensitive habitat such as wetlands and riparian corridors
- Clearly defined monitoring and mitigation requirements in permits, with periodic reviews and requirements for adaptive management if impacts significantly exceed levels allowed by permit
- Guidance on cumulative population impacts assessment and mitigation.
[/font]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Leading Bird Conservation Group Formally Petitions Feds to Regulate Wind Industry [View all]
XemaSab
Dec 2011
OP
Naturally, the American Wind Energy Association cannot be considered entirely neutral in this matter
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2011
#11
Naturally, however their information here does, in fact, have a high degree of validity.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#13
Federal agency proposes voluntary guidelines for wind power developers to avoid bird deaths
XemaSab
Dec 2011
#4
”The government estimates that a minimum of 440,000 birds are currently killed each year…”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2011
#8
Power line pylon killed Berkley the adopted vulture, together with all the hopes of the environmenta
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2011
#18
Well, the conclusion (in this case) was that transmission lines should be made safer
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2011
#25
I'm merely saying, it would be inaccurate to say "technology that requires X..."
joshcryer
Dec 2011
#42
Mark Desholm is the leading authority on investigating avian interactions with wind technology
kristopher
Dec 2011
#38