Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DetlefK

(16,670 posts)
1. Just for comparison: I heard of a case in Germany where a company mixed toxic plastic in fertilizer.
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 08:29 AM
Jan 2015

It was found out too late. Now they are building a barrier in that community to keep the groundwater from the field from mixing with the municipal groundwater.
Another solution would be to simply remove the soil up to a depth of several feet from an area of several dozen square-kilometers in size. Oh, and put those thousand tons of toxic soil in a special dump.




Now upscale that to a case where tens of thousands of square-kilometers are no longer considered safe for agricultural use.

And:
"For instance, China has 20 main types of soil that contain very different levels of cadmium, making it difficult to judge the pollution level of the metal under one standard, Zhao said. He suggested a ladder design for standards to be applied in different regions."

To me, toxic is toxic. I don't care if it's industrial toxic or natural toxic.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Good Idea! Chinese Gov P...»Reply #1