Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
9. ABC might be unduly influenced by antirenewable interests.
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 06:03 PM
Dec 2011

Sourcewatch:

American Bird Conservancy (ABC) "is a 501(c)(3), not-for profit organization whose mission is to conserve native wild birds and their habitats throughout the Americas." [1]

"Among the major corporate partners that ABC has recently engaged with are the Mitsubishi Corporation Foundation for the Americas, Swarovski Optik, and ConocoPhillips." [2]


Mitsubishi is nuclear and Conoco is fossil.Others on the board include:
an executive from a major PR firm that specializes in social outreach and greenwashing corporate activities.
Martha Boudreau, serves as General Manager of Fleishman-Hillard’s Washington, DC office

V. Richard Eales, of Malvern, Pennsylvania, is currently Lead Director of Range Resources Corporation, an oil and gas exploration and production company.


http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Bird_Conservancy

As far as I know it was founded by a genuinely concerned bird lover, but it didn't register on the national scene until it started making hyperbolic attacks against renewable energy as a major threat to avian populations. The primary mission of the group undoubtedly is aimed at avian conservation. Wowever, with the corporate influences that have direct involvement in shaping the organization's policies, and given the disproportionate focus on the compartively damage from renewables relative to nuclear and fossil fuels, it seems prudent consider the possibility that they are really little more than a front group for a well crafted astroturfing campaign by the entrenched energy industry.

For example, here is one such assertion from the group and a response from the wind industry trade group the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA).
"Bird deaths from wind power are the new inconvenient truth. The total number of birds killed and the amount of bird habitat lost will dramatically increase as wind power build-out continues across the country in a rush to meet federal renewable energy targets."²
--Mike Parr, Vice President of the American Bird Conservancy


The Reality: Wind power is far less harmful to birds than the fossil fuels it displaces. Incidental losses of individual birds at turbine sites will always be an extremely small fraction of bird deaths caused by human activities.:

- Wind is the only source of energy that does not present population-level risks to birds, according to a study of coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear, hydroelectric, and wind power. ³
- Wind turbines are estimated to cause less than three out of every 100,000 human-related bird deaths in the U.S., and will never cause more than a very small fraction no matter how extensively wind power is used in the future, the National Academy of Sciences found. 4
- Wind power causes far fewer losses of birds (approximately 108,000 a year) than buildings (550 million), power lines (130 million), cars (80 million), poisoning by pesticides (67 million), domestic cats (at least 10 million), and radio and cell towers (4.5 million). 5
- Non-renewable energy sources "pose higher risks to wildlife" than renewable sources. Coal - which wind directly replaces - "is by far the largest contributor" to wildlife risks. 6



¹ " Windmills Are Killing Our Birds," Robert Bryce op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, September 7, 2009
² "Bird Deaths from Wind Farms to Continue Under New Federal Voluntary Industry Guidelines," American Bird Conservancy press release, February 8, 2011
3 6 "Comparison Of Reported Effects And Risks To Vertebrate Wildlife From Six Electricity Generation Types In The New York/New England Region," New York State Research and Development Authority, March 2009
4 "Environmental Impacts of Wind-Energy Projects," National Academy of Sciences, 2007
5"A Summary and Comparison of Bird Mortality from Anthropogenic Causes with an Emphasis on Collisions," USDA Forest Service, 2005


AWEA has worked closely with environmental organizations as it has developed in an effort to ensure that their business practices

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I live next to a LARGE wind farm. I have never seen a bird hurt by it. Vincardog Dec 2011 #1
Not all windfarms are equal in this respect. Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #2
ABC might be unduly influenced by antirenewable interests. kristopher Dec 2011 #9
Naturally, the American Wind Energy Association cannot be considered entirely neutral in this matter OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #11
Naturally, however their information here does, in fact, have a high degree of validity. kristopher Dec 2011 #13
Swarovski = Big Optics XemaSab Dec 2011 #12
I reckon they've been paid off by Mitsubishi... Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #19
No wonder you are gaga over nuclear power. kristopher Dec 2011 #37
And people think the Germans have no sense of humour. nt Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #41
Already being done? Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #3
Federal agency proposes voluntary guidelines for wind power developers to avoid bird deaths XemaSab Dec 2011 #4
OK, I'm surprised... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #5
Audubon's Position on Wind Power OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #6
Today... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #7
”The government estimates that a minimum of 440,000 birds are currently killed each year…” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #8
ABCbirds can’t get their story straight OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #14
Putting 440,000 bird deaths into perspective OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #15
. XemaSab Dec 2011 #16
Well, that certainly sucked OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #17
Power line pylon killed Berkley the adopted vulture, together with all the hopes of the environmenta OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #18
My friends in Ohio XemaSab Dec 2011 #20
Well, the conclusion (in this case) was that transmission lines should be made safer OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #25
Altamont Pass, a nasty start... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #28
Faster turbines, slower turbines OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #36
Yes, tip speed my be faster, but... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #39
But more vultures are killed by cats. Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #21
That's why you should keep your damn cat in the damn house XemaSab Dec 2011 #22
What, and pay for food? Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #23
Do they like rare, endemic parrots? XemaSab Dec 2011 #24
Nah... Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #26
I know how to stop a parrot from screeching OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #27
First, catch your parrot... Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #30
Beautiful plumage… OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #35
Here’s a fascinating study OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #10
There's another "wind kills birds" piece floating around the web. Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #29
That's a little rich... Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #31
Eh, power lines are a big contributor, too. joshcryer Dec 2011 #32
Yes, check out the studies I mentioned OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #34
I'm merely saying, it would be inaccurate to say "technology that requires X..." joshcryer Dec 2011 #42
So, the obvious answer is to bury the cables OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #43
Would burying cables actually be more expensive? Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #44
Estimates vary… OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #45
Yeah, but that's not happening and may not be necessary. joshcryer Dec 2011 #46
We wouldn’t want to save too many birds… (Right?) ;-) OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #47
Oh, I agree, absolutely. joshcryer Dec 2011 #48
Yes, it's Virginia OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #33
The NYT is turning into a POS when it comes to the environment... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #40
Mark Desholm is the leading authority on investigating avian interactions with wind technology kristopher Dec 2011 #38
Well meaning fools or AstroTurf? You decide. txlibdem Dec 2011 #49
Here's an LA Times article about this: XemaSab Dec 2011 #50
"an industry lobbying group" joshcryer Dec 2011 #51
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Leading Bird Conservation...»Reply #9