Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
11. First, hydrogen is not an energy source.
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 02:47 PM
Apr 2015

There are no natural sources for molecular hydrogen on Earth. NONE!! All hydrogen comes from (electro-)chemical processes. All of it.

Second, is a rather significant issue of the laws of thermodynamics, which I believe physicist Arthur Eddington once wrote about.

Aha! Here it is:

The law that entropy always increases, holds, I think, the supreme position among the laws of Nature. If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the universe is in disagreement with Maxwell's equations — then so much the worse for Maxwell's equations. If it is found to be contradicted by observation — well, these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes. But if your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation.


If you want a hydrogen economy you are going to have to put more energy into generating the hydrogen than you will get out of burning it (in whatever way you do that).

Hydrogen could be useful for things like jet planes, rockets to outer space, etc. But a hydrogen economy must be built upon an already existing green energy economy or it is utterly useless.

Hydrogen is not an energy source on Earth because there is zero molecular hydrogen on Earth.

Physics 101!

R&K my friend.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»DU: Beware the Hydrogen E...»Reply #11