Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)

2. Good. Cut them off entirely, and don't renew the permit in light of the drought.

Reply to jakeXT (Original post)

Tue Apr 14, 2015, 07:17 AM

Apr 2015

Shut it down.

Heck, require them to bring as much water back to the state from elsewhere as they've taken for the 27 years they've been taking water without a permit.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nestl�'s California Water Permit Expired 27 Years Ago [View all] jakeXT Apr 2015 OP

Since 1849 they have been a Fascist state . n/t orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #1

Good. Cut them off entirely, and don't renew the permit in light of the drought. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #2

Absolutely no one is twisting anyone's arms to drink bottled water. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #3

If 'the cost in water is next to nothing' Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #4

That's not a very logical statement. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #5

No, the major cost is in the tons of plastic the "health conscious" dump all over the landscape Scootaloo Apr 2015 #6

Even if the plastic is properly collected and recycled... Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #9

Plus those plastic water bottles which are part of our modern landscape. Dont call me Shirley Apr 2015 #7

Guess a little research is in order TNNurse Apr 2015 #8

"What else would we find?" Nihil Apr 2015 #10