> We cannot imagine that, if we knew that we had only 10 years to divert or destroy a
> humanity-destroying meteor heading straight at us, the governments and media would
> continue with business as usual.
They would do exactly that as the last things they would want would be open debate of
costs & benefits of any possible plans, the recognition that there are guaranteed losers
in the near future and the ensuing panic of the populace.
> Governments, at least those with technological capabilities, would work together
> day and night to figure out the best approach, then provide all the needed resources
> - many trillions of dollars, if necessary - to prevent the destruction of human civilization.
Not after someone pointed out the gain involved from not being at Ground Zero.
> The U.S. media would, as they did in World War II, explain the nature of the threat and
> why citizens will need to make sacrifices - perhaps enormous ones, because no sacrifice
> would be too great.
Or, as it did for the Spanish-American War, the Gulf of Tonkin, Iraq, ... and totally mislead
the citizens in order to benefit the 0.1% ... who already own the media, the politicians and
most of the infrastructure necessary to preserve the lifestyle of those going along with
the ploy ... hmmm ... now which option is the most likely?
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read