Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

In reply to the discussion: Victims of Fukushima [View all]

madokie

(51,076 posts)
10. Two things concerning nuclear energy
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 08:41 AM
Apr 2015

that says we should not be using it it. 1: As long as we don't know what or how to deal with the everyday waste we should not be making more. I know there are those who say Oh we know what to do with it, bury it, Well to that I ask where? 2: As long as we don't know how to control it when it goes wrong we should not be using it for any reason. Putting a sarcophagus over it as they did in Chernobyl is not the answer nor is letting it run its course as they're doing in Fukushima now is either. Tepco has admitted they do not know what to do, no one does.

On paper under ideal condition I can't see why we'd use anything else but nuclear energy, trouble is 1&2 I listed above.

Yucca mountain wouldn't hold all of what we have today let alone hold what is made in the future so that is out as a viable means of disposing of the waste.

something to think about: http://science.nationalgeographic.com/science/earth/inside-the-earth/nuclear-waste/

On a level playing field there would be no and I mean NO nuclear power plants in the usa today. We've wasted 60 plus years of developments of alternate methods of making our electricity because of the pig in a poke called safe and cheap energy we were sold all those years ago.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Victims of Fukushima»Reply #10