Environment & Energy

chervilant

(8,267 posts)

14. "Blah, blah, blah, Ginger, blah, blah, blah!"

Sat Apr 18, 2015, 11:17 PM

Apr 2015

I trust that you will seek whatever resources you consider "reliable," in order to develop an informed opinion about whether the radiation spewing into the Pacific from the crippled Fukushima reactors is adversely affecting the flora and fauna of the ocean. I believe that it is, and this article is the only one I could find regarding the autopsy results on the dead dolphins. Perhaps you can share anything you might have found?

Snarking at resources does not change the fact that the Fukushima disaster continues unabated, and the co-opted press has provided very limited information.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Victims of Fukushima [View all] chervilant Apr 2015 OP

And is this a surprise guillaumeb Apr 2015 #1

Some members of this forum chervilant Apr 2015 #3

Doesn't "victims" encompass us all? . . . Journeyman Apr 2015 #2

Yes, chervilant Apr 2015 #4

My response to them is ever the same: Benjamin Franklin expressed it in "Poor Richard's Almanack"... Journeyman Apr 2015 #6

You notice none of the actual researchers state the ischaemia was caused by radiation? NickB79 Apr 2015 #5

That scientists and others chervilant Apr 2015 #8

So the scientists are in on it too? NickB79 Apr 2015 #11

Puh-leeze! chervilant Apr 2015 #13

The translated article comes from EneNews sue4e3 Apr 2015 #7

Really? chervilant Apr 2015 #9

believe what you want sue4e3 Apr 2015 #12

"Blah, blah, blah, Ginger, blah, blah, blah!" chervilant Apr 2015 #14

Call it what you want I just don't believe anything enenews has to say sue4e3 Apr 2015 #16

ENENews.com is an aggregator of other news sources mackdaddy Apr 2015 #15

Two things concerning nuclear energy madokie Apr 2015 #10