Environment & Energy

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)

15. Nepal is so far from the nearest sea that sea level rise contributed ZERO

Mon Apr 27, 2015, 06:07 PM

Apr 2015

to the earthquake. (Accurate to within 7 decimal places)

Sure, glacier melt has some effect, but realistically, we are talking about a contribution so miniscule as to be meaningless.

Frankly, it makes just as much sense to say that a falling stock market caused the earthquake. Or maybe it was triggered when you dropped a pencil on the floor a couple days ago. Pencils hitting the floor could effect plate tectonics. Except they didn't.

BTW: Citing your own posts is not the same as citing an authoritative source. And the source you did cite mentions 20% change in 10 million years! That's, let's see, 1/ten millionth of 20% is 0% (to 7 decimal places. The actual figure is 0.00000002.) Given those figures, that dropped pencil is starting to look like a better candidate for the cause.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question to you smart people in this group re: Nepal earthquake [View all] marym625 Apr 2015 OP

No. Plate tectonics NV Whino Apr 2015 #1

so plate tectonics marym625 Apr 2015 #5

Correct OKIsItJustMe Apr 2015 #45

Thank you for the answer marym625 Apr 2015 #46

Yes, I read them OKIsItJustMe Apr 2015 #47

Thank you marym625 Apr 2015 #48

You’re welcome OKIsItJustMe Apr 2015 #49

Sorry, I am really behind on responding to things marym625 May 2015 #58

Now if they had been fracking in the area.... daleanime Apr 2015 #2

I actually was wondering just that marym625 Apr 2015 #6

yes there is fracking questionseverything Apr 2015 #28

Well shit! marym625 Apr 2015 #35

No. Earthquakes in that area have been common for... TreasonousBastard Apr 2015 #3

I do understand that earthquakes are natural events marym625 Apr 2015 #7

Yes, changes in storm intensity and sea level affect plate tectonics. bananas Apr 2015 #4

Thank you marym625 Apr 2015 #8

And this is why that's no such thing..... daleanime Apr 2015 #9

I'm glad I am not the only one educated here. marym625 Apr 2015 #10

Geological time scales are SheilaT Apr 2015 #26

Yes, I get that marym625 Apr 2015 #31

Nepal is located on a major tectonic plate Travis_0004 Apr 2015 #38

I'm waiting for the earthquake in Chicago marym625 Apr 2015 #39

You make a good point. SheilaT Apr 2015 #42

Thank you! marym625 May 2015 #59

The quake that made the Mississippi run backward SheilaT May 2015 #65

I haven't visited, yet marym625 May 2015 #66

There was just a quake epicenter Galesburg Michigan marym625 May 2015 #62

Nepal is so far from the nearest sea that sea level rise contributed ZERO Binkie The Clown Apr 2015 #15

But, marym625 Apr 2015 #36

Fracking Earthquakes are usually around 3.0. Nepal was a 7.8 Travis_0004 Apr 2015 #40

I don't think it's all humans marym625 Apr 2015 #41

I spent six years studying subduction zone magma production and mantle melting processes. Maedhros Apr 2015 #51

ya know, i asked a similar question in this forum a few years ago. mopinko Apr 2015 #11

I hope we learn it marym625 Apr 2015 #12

What physics lessons would that be? dbackjon Apr 2015 #19

that at a certain point a heating planet mopinko Apr 2015 #20

The atmosphere would have to get awfully hot dbackjon Apr 2015 #21

the heating of the oceans would mopinko Apr 2015 #23

No - the oceans warming a degree or two will do ZERO to the crust dbackjon Apr 2015 #24

Our understanding of plate tectonics doesn't go back very far.. kristopher Apr 2015 #13

K&R marym625 Apr 2015 #14

No! Absolutely not. Binkie The Clown Apr 2015 #16

Upon further researhc, I may have overstated my case... Binkie The Clown Apr 2015 #18

I appreciate this marym625 Apr 2015 #29

I have occasionaly fits of close-mindedness, but I usually recover. n/t Binkie The Clown Apr 2015 #30

Same here! marym625 Apr 2015 #37

Newsweek: More Fatal Earthquakes to Come, Warn Climate Change Scientists mackdaddy Apr 2015 #17

Dr. Vivek Kumar Srivastava agrees Optical.Catalyst Apr 2015 #22

Thank you Boomer Apr 2015 #25

and how much does it have to rise marym625 Apr 2015 #33

"10cm or 15cm rise in sea level...." bloom Apr 2015 #53

Thank you very much marym625 Apr 2015 #34

From what I think I know about plate tectonics, SheilaT Apr 2015 #27

I can see both sides of it marym625 Apr 2015 #32

We do know that fracking can cause small earthquakes. SheilaT Apr 2015 #43

No, not directly but indirectly it becomes a "Possibly". Nihil Apr 2015 #44

Thank you marym625 May 2015 #60

I would think that the melting of all of that heavy ice MAY have an impact.. truebrit71 Apr 2015 #50

Me too marym625 May 2015 #55

I wouldn't discount it, but will leave it to the scientists. Cleita Apr 2015 #52

I agree marym625 May 2015 #56

Found a reference article Boomer May 2015 #54

That's quite a move! marym625 May 2015 #57

And now article specifically about Nepal's earthquake! Boomer May 2015 #61

This explains a lot.. cilla4progress May 2015 #63

That is interesting in itself marym625 May 2015 #64

My experience was there is no one cilla4progress May 2015 #67

Thank you marym625 May 2015 #68