Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Question to you smart people in this group re: Nepal earthquake [View all]Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)40. Fracking Earthquakes are usually around 3.0. Nepal was a 7.8
Remember also that the Richter scale is logarithmic as well. Lets be generous assume the average fracking earthquake measured at 4.0 (which is 10 times stronger than a 3.0). That means that a 7.8 earthquake is over 6,000 times stronger than the (generous) fracking earthquake.). It would release over 500,000 times more energy than the average fracking earthquake.
I don't think humans could cause an earthquake of that magnitude even if that was our goal, let alone as an accidental byproduct.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nepal is so far from the nearest sea that sea level rise contributed ZERO
Binkie The Clown
Apr 2015
#15
I spent six years studying subduction zone magma production and mantle melting processes.
Maedhros
Apr 2015
#51
I have occasionaly fits of close-mindedness, but I usually recover. n/t
Binkie The Clown
Apr 2015
#30
I would think that the melting of all of that heavy ice MAY have an impact..
truebrit71
Apr 2015
#50