Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
6. You think thirteen million trees are on private property?! They're the national forests.
Sun May 10, 2015, 02:47 AM
May 2015

Last edited Mon May 11, 2015, 12:36 PM - Edit history (1)

In other words, you and I "own" those trees. Uncle Sam "owns" those trees. What do you mean "harass the owners"? What does that even mean to you?

California is a mountainous state, and that's where the national forests are. It's a huge amount of territory. It's not all pine by any means, it varies by region. A lot of California is chaparral and is made to burn every few decades -- but we also have almost 40 million people living in this state, and you wouldn't believe how many are living on the interface between wild land and urban areas.

It's difficult to manage a major forest fire. You can look up the Zaca Fire from a few years back. It was in my region and it burned for months. I think it ended up consuming a quarter million acres. Fortunately for everyone the firefighters were able to drive it back from populated areas, and the decision was made to let it burn itself out in the forest. The air quality throughout the entire region was unsafe to breathe for anyone with asthma or other lung issues.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

let them burn and just protect housing etc. fire is the natural cleanser of the forests. some msongs May 2015 #1
In this case it won't cleanse the forest... Binkie The Clown May 2015 #2
That's in a natural cycle. delrem May 2015 #5
k&R nt Mojorabbit May 2015 #3
If those trees were on private "residence" land Trillo May 2015 #4
You think thirteen million trees are on private property?! They're the national forests. Hekate May 2015 #6
It appears you have a reading disability. I wrote, Trillo May 2015 #8
Private residences with a fire hazard should be ordered to do a cleanup. SunSeeker May 2015 #9
"Anti-government"? Yours is a logic disability, not a reading one. Trillo May 2015 #10
Wow. All you can do is project and insult. SunSeeker May 2015 #11
Your claim is false. You wrote, Trillo May 2015 #13
Wow. I'm shocked to see people on DU denying that this is a problem. It's a BIG problem. C Moon May 2015 #7
Yup. Sad really. SunSeeker May 2015 #12
I never wrote "clear cut", that has a specific meaning in forestry. Trillo May 2015 #14
What the fuck else could you mean when talking about clearing millions of dead trees? SunSeeker May 2015 #15
Exactly what I wrote, that's "what the fuck." Trillo May 2015 #16
I won't put you on ignore. I want to be on your jury. nt SunSeeker May 2015 #17
You should stop the ad hominem attacks, you have just admitted to making DU suck. Trillo May 2015 #18
Trillo, you are really close to being blocked from E&E - I suggest you rein it in. hatrack May 2015 #19
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»CA: Extreme Fire Hazard a...»Reply #6