Last edited Fri May 22, 2015, 11:10 AM - Edit history (1)
...so called "renewable energy" scam produce of the 550 exajoules humanity consumes each year produce?
Nuclear energy is still the world's largest, by far, source of climate change gas free energy, despite decades of insipid attacks by people who can't understand the contents of a science book.
Is the fact that the fastest growing form on this energy is dangerous natural gas the fault of nuclear power plants operating at 90% of capacity utilization or wind plants operating at 30% and solar plants operating at 20%?
I note, with due respect, that the 1.8 trillion dollar figure for renewables in the last decade does include the cost of the dangerous natural gas that is required to back this expensive wasteful scam up on hot summer nights during the doldrums.
We hear anti-nukes discussing nuclear engineering with obvious ignorance. Do they discuss dangerous fossil fuels? Are they interested in dangerous fossil fuels?
Their behavior suggests otherwise.
Here, is what the 1.8 trillion of wasted resources on so called "renewable energy" produced: >403 ppm, April 2015. Last week, the weekly data for dangerous fossil fuel waste in the atmosphere established an all time record, 404 ppm.
Do we hear anti-nukes complain about dangerous fossil fuel, or do we see them posting illiterate junk about nuclear engineering from their circle of nonsense mongers quoting one another?
The slick so called "renewable energy" industry, funded and supported by the dangerous fossil fuel industry and the mining industry, got the money with your slick and insipid marketing, and the future will pay. History, should it survive, will record anti-nukes rather like historians now regard the crusaders, the ignorant seeking to conquer the wise.
= new reply since forum marked as read