Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(20,370 posts)
6. "Bt was used....more than 40 years without observable resistance"
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:16 PM
May 2015

Why was this, you ask?

The answer is simple: organic farms comprise such a small amount of actual farmland that any resistance developed by the local population would quickly be diluted and nullified by continuous breeding with the non-Bt treated conventional fields (this was before Bt crops were introduced). With only a fraction of the insect population being exposed to Bt, continous interbreeding with non-Bt resistant populations from neighboring farms, and Bt resistance conveying no survival benefits outside the few organic farms in existence, the answer is very clear why we never saw Bt resistance before GMO's incorporated it.

It's also pretty much EXACTLY what has been proposed for the past 20 years to prevent this very sort of thing from happening: the planting of crop refuges to stop resistance from arising.

The problem is that, given the scale of GMO cultivation, the paltry area of refuge crops planted have had little effect.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Who Could Have Pre-, No, ...»Reply #6