Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

8. "the US could do what other nations that have nuclear power are doing; reprocess and recycle"

Reply to PamW (Reply #7)

Mon Mar 5, 2012, 11:06 AM

Mar 2012

You make claims that are all over the place, Pam.

The state of other nations' reprocessing and recycling efforts are also dealt with, and the facts are not helpful to your efforts at promoting nuclear reactors:
THE MYTHOLOGY AND MESSY REALITY OF NUCLEAR FUEL REPROCESSING,
Arjun Makhijani, Ph.D. April 8, 2010
On the Web at http://www.ieer.org/reports/reprocessing2010.pdf

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

$8.3 B: A Big Price Tag For a DOE Dice Roll [View all] kristopher Mar 2012 OP

Imagine an $8.3 billion investment in renewables... democrat_patriot Mar 2012 #1

Right now; no where. But it doesn't have to be that way. PamW Mar 2012 #2

"... like the “too cheap to meter” slogan of the 1950s" kristopher Mar 2012 #3

WRONG AS ALWAYS!! PamW Mar 2012 #4

BAD DATA! PamW Mar 2012 #5

THE MYTHOLOGY AND MESSY REALITY OF NUCLEAR FUEL REPROCESSING, Page 37 kristopher Mar 2012 #6

Reading comprehension again. PamW Mar 2012 #7

"the US could do what other nations that have nuclear power are doing; reprocess and recycle" kristopher Mar 2012 #8

very simple statementt PamW Mar 2012 #9