Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
2. right. more from the article referenced in OP.
Wed May 27, 2015, 07:29 PM
May 2015
"Baseload" plants, a term typically applied to nuclear or coal-fired power plants, provide energy and some capacity. Interestingly, other types of power plants can provide these resources, often at costs competitive with baseload plants. Wind plants can produce energy just as well or better than nuclear or coal plants, while natural gas plants can provide capacity at lower cost than nuclear or coal plants. Thus, despite claims to the contrary, there is no inherent need for baseload power.


ZERO is being said in D.C. or on GOP-M$M about the fact that wind power is competitive with coal and that as the number of Wind farms increases the need for as much Base Load capacity is reduced! And this makes the grid MORE RELIABLE. -- oh, and then there's the zero operations emissions part of it, too!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»"Baseload capacity i...»Reply #2