Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(105,866 posts)
4. From a climate point of view, we'd have been worse off; they'd have used coal
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 08:18 AM
Jun 2015

which is more compact to carry than wood. Either would have been bad, ecologically. Coal was what they used a few decades later for the railways. Whether 'cars' could have taken off in the 18th century is doubtful, though; for independent vehicles, you need them to be reliable, and technology wasn't. On a train, you can have an expert ride along with the engine, but that's only feasible when there's a lot of cargo going with each expert.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»How fossil fuel burning n...»Reply #4