Environment & Energy

OKIsItJustMe

(21,734 posts)

11. You may misunderstand “S types”

Thu Jun 18, 2015, 01:57 PM

Jun 2015

http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2014/global-warming-cynics-unmoved-by-extreme-weather

[font face=Serif]Published: Nov. 24, 2014
[font size=5]Global warming cynics unmoved by extreme weather[/font]

[font size=3]What will it take to convince skeptics of global warming that the phenomenon is real? Surely, many scientists believe, enough droughts, floods and heat waves will begin to change minds.

…

As this study and McCright’s past research shows, political party identification plays a significant role in determining global warming beliefs. People who identify as Republican tend to doubt the existence of global warming, while Democrats generally believe in it.

The abnormally warm winter was just one in an ongoing series of severe weather events – including the 2010 Russian heat wave, Hurricane Sandy in 2012 and the 2013 typhoon in the Philippines – that many believed would help start convincing global warming cynics.

“There’s been a lot of talk among climate scientists, politicians and journalists that warmer winters like this would change people’s minds,” McCright said. “That the more people are exposed to climate change, the more they’ll be convinced. This study suggests this is not the case.”

…[/font][/font]

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2443

( http://www.democraticunderground.com/112778193 )

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why it's so hard to convince a climate denier [View all] GliderGuider Jun 2015 OP

For whatever their reasons, their brains are almost totally shutdown. nt ladjf Jun 2015 #1

N-type here. Maybe this will influence some... Ghost Dog Jun 2015 #2

"presenting them with data they can't process... Duppers Jun 2015 #3

This is then where everything breaks down The2ndWheel Jun 2015 #5

Science suggests the opposite OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #8

...when political passions come into play. Duppers Jun 2015 #18

Accountants, lawyers and Doctors are TRAINED to be that way happyslug Jun 2015 #21

there is another type -- those who deny professionally GreatGazoo Jun 2015 #4

two categories of psychological wiring PADemD Jun 2015 #6

I think “confirmation bias” goes a long way… OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #7

Practices like "fake balance" play into peoples' psychological predispositions. GliderGuider Jun 2015 #10

You may misunderstand “S types” OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #11

How so? GliderGuider Jun 2015 #12

“S types … innate tendency to trust what's in front of them.” OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #13

ergo why I used the word "tendency". GliderGuider Jun 2015 #14

Right. My point here is that I don’t think it’s an S -vs- N thing at all OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #15

OK, and I think S/N plays a significant role. GliderGuider Jun 2015 #16

It may play a role OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #17

Deniers are 'practical' people pscot Jun 2015 #9

The irony here is amusing LouisvilleDem Jun 2015 #19

GG; I'm afraid I couldn't disagree more with your statement: "As far as I can tell, most scientists Bill USA Jun 2015 #20

I have no problem with your disagreement GliderGuider Jun 2015 #22

are you referring to Myers-Briggs Type Indicator? Bill USA Jun 2015 #23

I come from a hard-science family GliderGuider Jun 2015 #24

You need both LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #25

never said there was no intuition involved in conduct of scientific discovery. Without that you'd Bill USA Jul 2015 #27

And I was just talking about the MBTI. GliderGuider Jul 2015 #28

I do not understand it.. its the one thing that drives me nutsy Peacetrain Jul 2015 #26