Environment & Energy

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)

12. How so?

Thu Jun 18, 2015, 02:11 PM

Jun 2015

I see an overlap between deniers and Republicans (or conservatives in general), and Republicans are more often S types.

Type and U.S. Political Party Affiliations

Sensing-Intuition. Sensing and intuition are the only psychological type preferences that show any consistent relationship to political ideology (in the few studies of which we are aware). In particular, clearer preferences for Sensing associate with conservative leanings whereas clearer preferences for Intuition associate with a more liberal orientation.

Consider the characteristics of Sensing and Intuition types. Sensing types routinely are characterized as practical, realistic, and concerned with the here-and-now. They trust experience and facts. On the other hand, Intuiting types are characterized as imaginative, abstract, and concerned with the future. They trust hunches and possibilities.

What do you feel I misunderstand?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why it's so hard to convince a climate denier [View all] GliderGuider Jun 2015 OP

For whatever their reasons, their brains are almost totally shutdown. nt ladjf Jun 2015 #1

N-type here. Maybe this will influence some... Ghost Dog Jun 2015 #2

"presenting them with data they can't process... Duppers Jun 2015 #3

This is then where everything breaks down The2ndWheel Jun 2015 #5

Science suggests the opposite OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #8

...when political passions come into play. Duppers Jun 2015 #18

Accountants, lawyers and Doctors are TRAINED to be that way happyslug Jun 2015 #21

there is another type -- those who deny professionally GreatGazoo Jun 2015 #4

two categories of psychological wiring PADemD Jun 2015 #6

I think “confirmation bias” goes a long way… OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #7

Practices like "fake balance" play into peoples' psychological predispositions. GliderGuider Jun 2015 #10

You may misunderstand “S types” OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #11

How so? GliderGuider Jun 2015 #12

“S types … innate tendency to trust what's in front of them.” OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #13

ergo why I used the word "tendency". GliderGuider Jun 2015 #14

Right. My point here is that I don’t think it’s an S -vs- N thing at all OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #15

OK, and I think S/N plays a significant role. GliderGuider Jun 2015 #16

It may play a role OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #17

Deniers are 'practical' people pscot Jun 2015 #9

The irony here is amusing LouisvilleDem Jun 2015 #19

GG; I'm afraid I couldn't disagree more with your statement: "As far as I can tell, most scientists Bill USA Jun 2015 #20

I have no problem with your disagreement GliderGuider Jun 2015 #22

are you referring to Myers-Briggs Type Indicator? Bill USA Jun 2015 #23

I come from a hard-science family GliderGuider Jun 2015 #24

You need both LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #25

never said there was no intuition involved in conduct of scientific discovery. Without that you'd Bill USA Jul 2015 #27

And I was just talking about the MBTI. GliderGuider Jul 2015 #28

I do not understand it.. its the one thing that drives me nutsy Peacetrain Jul 2015 #26