Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edgineered

(2,101 posts)
6. Sure, they don't run old fuel.
Wed Jul 1, 2015, 07:31 PM
Jul 2015

This year the fuel doesn't seem to go bad as quickly as it has in the past several years. All riders are given a few tips when they pick up their bikes; those who ride infrequently are told to keep a minimal level of fuel in their tanks. Basically for those who do not ride at least once every few weeks my advice is for them to bring the bike home nearly empty. If planning on riding 60 miles, drive to the gas station and put in a few gallons only. That way each time they ride they are using relatively fresh gas. Not only does the ethanol blend cause the mold, but the deteriorated fuel doesn't allow the bike to rev easily - I'm guessing because of a longer burn time. For those who drive or ride regularly, and have newer machines with fuel injection don't have these problems. Whether it is the ethanol, the mold, the propensity to hold water, the age of the fuel, or any combination of them isn't clear, what is clear is that the problem with many things I repair comes from this category. Coincidence?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I find this hard to believe. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2015 #1
not only problems with water, but edgineered Jul 2015 #2
NASCAR and INDY car teams don't seem to mind using ethanol (Indy cars 100%, NASCAR: E15) Bill USA Jul 2015 #4
Sure, they don't run old fuel. edgineered Jul 2015 #6
Ethanol does absorb water. something that you have to keep in mind if there are breaks between uses. Bill USA Jul 2015 #8
The maintenance done by professional racers is different than consumers OakCliffDem Jul 2015 #12
many tests have been done with E10. They always show a mileage decrement barely discernable ~ 2%. Bill USA Jul 2015 #3
We have a 2014 ford Focus madokie Jul 2015 #7
since 'we're' talking single cases here.. another study had two vehicles that did far Bill USA Jul 2015 #15
Yes I was using the 10% blend madokie Jul 2015 #19
Even at 52mpg, my motorcycle gains nothing from higher octane. AtheistCrusader Jul 2015 #9
no engine will gain the benefits of higher octane fuel without proper timing and compression ratio Bill USA Jul 2015 #14
I've tested this over many tanks. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2015 #11
this is a sample size of "1". But, as I said, nothing it being done to take advantage of ethanol's Bill USA Jul 2015 #17
3 MIT scientists designed a Direct Injection ethanol turbocharged engine: 25% better fuel efficicien Bill USA Jul 2015 #18
Ethanol injected as a knock suppressant into a high compression engine may yield benefits. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2015 #20
the high compression is achieved by use of turbo-charging not fixed by stroke. Bill USA Jul 2015 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author lumberjack_jeff Jul 2015 #22
in anticipation of possible comment re lobbying: National Corn growers: $370,000 in 2014, Oil Bill USA Jul 2015 #5
Yeah, I wonder who their funders are. nilram Jul 2015 #10
yeah, if in doubt that means it's definitely witchcraft. Best cover your eyes and not read it. Bill USA Jul 2015 #16
With fuel stabilizer added to every jug, my small engines do OK. appal_jack Jul 2015 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»study: gasoline without e...»Reply #6