Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
Wed Jul 22, 2015, 04:49 PM Jul 2015

When the End of Human Civilization Is Your Day Job [View all]

(cross-posted from GD)

Among many climate scientists, gloom has set in. Things are worse than we think, but they can't really talk about it.


[font size=-1]In the photo: Glaciologist Jason Box, left, at work on the Petermann Glacier on Greenland's northwest coast, which has lost mass at an accelerated pace in recent years. Box and his family left Ohio State for Europe a couple years ago, and he is relieved to have escaped America's culture of climate-change denial (Photo: Nick Cobbing).[/font]

--

The incident was small, but Jason Box doesn't want to talk about it. He's been skittish about the media since it happened. This was last summer, as he was reading the cheery blog posts transmitted by the chief scientist on the Swedish icebreaker Oden, which was exploring the Arctic for an international expedition led by Stockholm University. "Our first observations of elevated methane levels, about ten times higher than in background seawater, were documented . . . we discovered over 100 new methane seep sites.... The weather Gods are still on our side as we steam through a now ice-free Laptev Sea...."

As a leading climatologist who spent many years studying the Arctic at the Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center at Ohio State, Box knew that this breezy scientific detachment described one of the nightmare long-shot climate scenarios: a feedback loop where warming seas release methane that causes warming that releases more methane that causes more warming, on and on until the planet is incompatible with human life. And he knew there were similar methane releases occurring in the area. On impulse, he sent out a tweet.

"If even a small fraction of Arctic sea floor carbon is released to the atmosphere, we're f'd."

The tweet immediately went viral, inspiring a series of headlines:

CLIMATOLOGIST SAYS ARCTIC CARBON RELEASE COULD MEAN "WE'RE FUCKED."

CLIMATE SCIENTIST DROPS THE F-BOMB AFTER STARTLING ARCTIC DISCOVERY.

CLIMATOLOGIST: METHANE PLUMES FROM THE ARCTIC MEAN WE'RE SCREWED.

Box has been outspoken for years. He's done science projects with Greenpeace, and he participated in the 2011 mass protest at the White House organized by 350.org. In 2013, he made headlines when a magazine reported his conclusion that a seventy-foot rise in sea levels over the next few centuries was probably already "baked into the system." Now, with one word, Box had ventured into two particularly dangerous areas. First, the dirty secret of climate science and government climate policies is that they're all based on probabilities, which means that the effects of standard CO2 targets like an 80 percent reduction by 2050 are based on the middle of the probability curve. Box had ventured to the darker possibilities on the curve's tail, where few scientists and zero politicians are willing to go.

...more...
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a36228/ballad-of-the-sad-climatologists-0815/
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It is as bad as many have suspected. Actual death threats made! More from OP's link: Mnemosyne Jul 2015 #1
"all amplified by a relentless propaganda campaign nakedly financed by the fossil-fuel companies." RiverLover Jul 2015 #4
Didn't we just have this article posted sue4e3 Jul 2015 #2
Read the article. RiverLover Jul 2015 #5
I did, twice now sue4e3 Jul 2015 #6
Sad...Its about how scientists aren't supposed to convey exactly how dire it is. Jeesh. RiverLover Jul 2015 #7
If that's how you feel sue4e3 Jul 2015 #8
Its ok you don't get this isn't regurgitating. Its insight into what scientists deal with, RiverLover Jul 2015 #9
Sobering article... truebrit71 Jul 2015 #3
Gavin Schmidt is not in denial LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #10
"You don't have to close down all the coal-powered stations tomorrow. You can transition." truebrit71 Jul 2015 #11
He isn't denying that 100 million people have to move LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #12
But it's not going to be 100 million people over 50 years.... truebrit71 Jul 2015 #13
How many will it be then? LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #14
According to this study, it looks like over 200 million would be displaced by a 3-meter rise GliderGuider Jul 2015 #15
Those numbers are not supported by the evidence LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #16
Remember the shape of an exponential curve? GliderGuider Jul 2015 #17
It doesn't make enough of a difference LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #18
What the paper says: GliderGuider Jul 2015 #19
Matter of time, we are fucked AuntPatsy Jul 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»When the End of Human Civ...»Reply #0