Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mnemosyne

(21,363 posts)
1. It is as bad as many have suspected. Actual death threats made! More from OP's link:
Wed Jul 22, 2015, 05:10 PM
Jul 2015

snip>>

Worse, he showed emotion, a subject ringed with taboos in all science but especially in climate science. As a recent study from the University of Bristol documented, climate scientists have been so distracted and intimidated by the relentless campaign against them that they tend to avoid any statements that might get them labeled "alarmists," retreating into a world of charts and data. But Box had been able to resist all that. He even chased the media splash in interviews with the Danish press, where they translated "we're fucked" into its more decorous Danish equivalent, "on our ass," plastering those dispiriting words in large-type headlines all across the country.


snip>>

"And yet, despite some encouraging developments in renewable energy and some breakthroughs in international leadership, carbon emissions continue to rise at a steady rate, and for their pains the scientists themselves—the cruelest blow of all—have been the targets of an unrelenting and well-organized attack that includes death threats, summonses from a hostile Congress, attempts to get them fired, legal harassment, and intrusive discovery demands so severe they had to start their own legal-defense fund, all amplified by a relentless propaganda campaign nakedly financed by the fossil-fuel companies."


snip>>

Among climate activists, gloom is building. Jim Driscoll of the National Institute for Peer Support just finished a study of a group of longtime activists whose most frequently reported feeling was sadness, followed by fear and anger. Dr. Lise Van Susteren, a practicing psychiatrist and graduate of Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth slide-show training, calls this "pretraumatic" stress. "So many of us are exhibiting all the signs and symptoms of posttraumatic disorder—the anger, the panic, the obsessive intrusive thoughts." Leading activist Gillian Caldwell went public with her "climate trauma," as she called it, quitting the group she helped build and posting an article called "16 Tips for Avoiding Climate Burnout," in which she suggests compartmentalization: "Reinforce boundaries between professional work and personal life. It is very hard to switch from the riveting force of apocalyptic predictions at work to home, where the problems are petty by comparison."


snip>>

[link:http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a36228/ballad-of-the-sad-climatologists-0815/]

Bold is mine.

Anyone that believes this isn't also being done to other scientists observing major ongoing events is extremely naive. This article is absolutely chilling.

Thanks EM.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It is as bad as many have suspected. Actual death threats made! More from OP's link: Mnemosyne Jul 2015 #1
"all amplified by a relentless propaganda campaign nakedly financed by the fossil-fuel companies." RiverLover Jul 2015 #4
Didn't we just have this article posted sue4e3 Jul 2015 #2
Read the article. RiverLover Jul 2015 #5
I did, twice now sue4e3 Jul 2015 #6
Sad...Its about how scientists aren't supposed to convey exactly how dire it is. Jeesh. RiverLover Jul 2015 #7
If that's how you feel sue4e3 Jul 2015 #8
Its ok you don't get this isn't regurgitating. Its insight into what scientists deal with, RiverLover Jul 2015 #9
Sobering article... truebrit71 Jul 2015 #3
Gavin Schmidt is not in denial LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #10
"You don't have to close down all the coal-powered stations tomorrow. You can transition." truebrit71 Jul 2015 #11
He isn't denying that 100 million people have to move LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #12
But it's not going to be 100 million people over 50 years.... truebrit71 Jul 2015 #13
How many will it be then? LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #14
According to this study, it looks like over 200 million would be displaced by a 3-meter rise GliderGuider Jul 2015 #15
Those numbers are not supported by the evidence LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #16
Remember the shape of an exponential curve? GliderGuider Jul 2015 #17
It doesn't make enough of a difference LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #18
What the paper says: GliderGuider Jul 2015 #19
Matter of time, we are fucked AuntPatsy Jul 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»When the End of Human Civ...»Reply #1