Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

LouisvilleDem

(303 posts)

10. Gavin Schmidt is not in denial

Reply to truebrit71 (Reply #3)

Thu Jul 23, 2015, 11:39 AM

Jul 2015

He simple disagrees with Jason Box. The simple fact is that Schmidt is well known as one of the world's leading climate scientists with a great deal more credibility than Box has. Reading the IPCC AR5, it is clear that the opinions that Box expresses are outliers among scientists.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

When the End of Human Civilization Is Your Day Job [View all] Electric Monk Jul 2015 OP

It is as bad as many have suspected. Actual death threats made! More from OP's link: Mnemosyne Jul 2015 #1

"all amplified by a relentless propaganda campaign nakedly financed by the fossil-fuel companies." RiverLover Jul 2015 #4

Didn't we just have this article posted sue4e3 Jul 2015 #2

Read the article. RiverLover Jul 2015 #5

I did, twice now sue4e3 Jul 2015 #6

Sad...Its about how scientists aren't supposed to convey exactly how dire it is. Jeesh. RiverLover Jul 2015 #7

If that's how you feel sue4e3 Jul 2015 #8

Its ok you don't get this isn't regurgitating. Its insight into what scientists deal with, RiverLover Jul 2015 #9

Sobering article... truebrit71 Jul 2015 #3

Gavin Schmidt is not in denial LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #10

"You don't have to close down all the coal-powered stations tomorrow. You can transition." truebrit71 Jul 2015 #11

He isn't denying that 100 million people have to move LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #12

But it's not going to be 100 million people over 50 years.... truebrit71 Jul 2015 #13

How many will it be then? LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #14

According to this study, it looks like over 200 million would be displaced by a 3-meter rise GliderGuider Jul 2015 #15

Those numbers are not supported by the evidence LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #16

Remember the shape of an exponential curve? GliderGuider Jul 2015 #17

It doesn't make enough of a difference LouisvilleDem Jul 2015 #18

What the paper says: GliderGuider Jul 2015 #19

Matter of time, we are fucked AuntPatsy Jul 2015 #20