Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Confusious

(8,317 posts)

8. It means you shat upon his glorious revolution

Reply to johnd83 (Reply #5)

Mon Mar 12, 2012, 10:43 PM

Mar 2012

Nothing that contradicts or sheds doubt upon the glorious revolution is true.

If 1+1=2 contradicted or shed doubt upon the glorious revolution, it would be false, and 1+1 would equal 3, or some other number, but not 2.

You'll learn.

Banged your head against a wall lately? It's pretty much the same feeling.

BTW, your numbers are fine. I've made the same point, using a quarter+ of Arizona. It doesn't get through.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nuclear power: A dream that failed [View all] kristopher Mar 2012 OP

The real failure is that nuclear power has become synonymous with "light water boiling reactors" johnd83 Mar 2012 #1

Bullpucky kristopher Mar 2012 #2

*sigh* let's do some math... johnd83 Mar 2012 #3

I won't honor your post with a response, your numbers just don't add up. n/t tech3149 Mar 2012 #4

What the is that supposed to mean? johnd83 Mar 2012 #5

It means you shat upon his glorious revolution Confusious Mar 2012 #8

It means your math is wrong - the area needed is TINY. bananas Mar 2012 #18

*sigh* More boilerplate misinformation? kristopher Mar 2012 #6

I've seen articles like that before johnd83 Mar 2012 #7

The article is backed up by a hell of a lot more than your hand waving... kristopher Mar 2012 #9

There are lots of critiques besides mine johnd83 Mar 2012 #11

"Track down a complete counter-argument"??? kristopher Mar 2012 #12

That website is full of bad information (to be polite). nt bananas Mar 2012 #19

WRONG!!! PamW Mar 2012 #14

My problem with nuclear power other than health reasons, have been as follows... freshwest Mar 2012 #10

The bomb is why we went with nuclear and that is pretty much why everyone else is building madokie Mar 2012 #13

Agreed. Gotta keep that MIC going. It's not just nuke vs. coal. Media is MIC owned. freshwest Mar 2012 #15

No doubt madokie Mar 2012 #17

WRONG AS ALWAYS!! PamW Mar 2012 #16

And still... kristopher Mar 2012 #20