Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
1. I spent almost 20 years working as a photojournalist in the 70s and 80s
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 08:47 AM
Oct 2015

The NatGeo photographers were some of my greatest influences. I've been watching the tragedy of stock photography unfold ever since, and it is a great weight on my heart. From media consolidation and the gutting of standards, to the embedding of war correspondents and the prohibition of photographic documentation of environmental and animal-rights abuses, the visuals available to the public are being very carefully managed to present a worldview favourable to the powers that be.

The prioritization of image management, more even than text management, speaks to the psychological awareness of those charged with managing our perceptions. Unlike text, whose meaning requires interpretation by the language centers of our brains, images require much less mental pre-processing. Their meaning is instantly and directly available to our emotional limbic systems. This makes images many times more powerful than text - which incidentally helps to explain the social power of TV compared to newspapers.

When images presents an unpalatable truth, their power represents a dire threat to those at the tip of the social hierarchy - those very people who have the financial means necessary to consolidate and groom the image stream available to the public.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Why Murdoch Running NatGe...»Reply #1