Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

starroute

(12,977 posts)
5. I've been noticing this a lot lately, and it bugs the hell out of me
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 12:14 PM
Oct 2015

I see it particularly at The Guardian's US edition -- where you'd really hope they'd know better. And what it seems to amount to, besides lazy journalism, is squeezing the human and emotional elements out of stories and lessening their impact.

Here's a current story about increasing numbers of Americans accepting the reality of climate change: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/13/rising-numbers-of-american-believe-climate-science-poll-shows

It's illustrated by a photo of two girls walking past an Assembly of God church. The photo is connected with the California water shortages -- but you wouldn't know that without reading the caption. And it has no direct relationship to anything in the story.

Here's a story about a pending merger in the beer industry and its likely negative impact on consumers. It's illustrated by a picture of two six-packs. Nothing to remind you of monopolistic practices, exploitation of third world beer drinkers, or much of anything, really. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/oct/13/sabmiller-agrees-ab-inbev-takeover-68bn

Here's one titled "Credit scores in America perpetuate racial injustice." It's illustrated by a photo of a credit report. Once again, the human impact has been left out entirely. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/13/your-credit-score-is-racist-heres-why

This is nothing-to-see-here-move-on journalism. And it sucks.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Why Murdoch Running NatGe...»Reply #5