Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)The climate fact no one will admit: 2 °C warming is inevitable [View all]
From the New Scientist:
The climate fact no one will admit: 2 °C warming is inevitable
It is time to start preparing for a world more than 2 °C warmer than now. The UNs own analysis of what countries are offering to do to limit greenhouse gas emissions shows they fall far short of whats required. In fact, they suggest the world will have emitted enough carbon dioxide to warm the planet 2 °C by around 2036.
These offers, formally known as Intended Nationally Determined Contributions or INDCs, will be the basis of the global treaty on climate change to be finalised in Paris in December. It was always clear that this treaty would not go nearly far enough to limit warming to 2 °C by 2100, but now the numbers are in.
Ahead of the meeting, 119 INDCs have been submitted, representing 147 countries and 88 per cent of current emissions. The UN has now released a synthesis report analysing what impact they will have. It concludes that even if countries stick to them, annual global emissions will hit 43 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (GtCO2) by 2030 and will still be rising.
It has been calculated that to have a 66 per cent chance of limiting warming to 2 °C, cumulative emissions from 2011 must be limited to 1000 GtCO2. The UN report, however, says well have burned through 75 per cent of this carbon budget by 2030. That means we could only emit another 250 GtCO2 after 2030 which means well bust the budget in around 2036 assuming emissions stay above 40 GtCO2 per year.
It is time to start preparing for a world more than 2 °C warmer than now. The UNs own analysis of what countries are offering to do to limit greenhouse gas emissions shows they fall far short of whats required. In fact, they suggest the world will have emitted enough carbon dioxide to warm the planet 2 °C by around 2036.
These offers, formally known as Intended Nationally Determined Contributions or INDCs, will be the basis of the global treaty on climate change to be finalised in Paris in December. It was always clear that this treaty would not go nearly far enough to limit warming to 2 °C by 2100, but now the numbers are in.
Ahead of the meeting, 119 INDCs have been submitted, representing 147 countries and 88 per cent of current emissions. The UN has now released a synthesis report analysing what impact they will have. It concludes that even if countries stick to them, annual global emissions will hit 43 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (GtCO2) by 2030 and will still be rising.
It has been calculated that to have a 66 per cent chance of limiting warming to 2 °C, cumulative emissions from 2011 must be limited to 1000 GtCO2. The UN report, however, says well have burned through 75 per cent of this carbon budget by 2030. That means we could only emit another 250 GtCO2 after 2030 which means well bust the budget in around 2036 assuming emissions stay above 40 GtCO2 per year.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In IPCC-speak, "There is at least a 66% chance that a 2C target is too optimistic."
GliderGuider
Nov 2015
#3
Basically the IPCC, their emasculated scientists, the politicians and media of the world.
GliderGuider
Nov 2015
#10
Do you think that people are generally beginning to understand that >2C is now unavoidable?
GliderGuider
Nov 2015
#12
OK, how about this: Americans Largely Unconcerned About Climate Change, Survey Finds
GliderGuider
Nov 2015
#16
Considering China's been busted for consuming far more coal than they say they do . .
hatrack
Nov 2015
#23
The only problem is that you intentionally ignore what researchers are telling us
NickB79
Nov 2015
#28
Thank you , but no belief system is going to make watching my children die easier
sue4e3
Nov 2015
#37
What "most people" think is largely irrelevant given how little the average person knows of science
NickB79
Nov 2015
#44
What impacts just humans isn't all that matters (at least, it shouldn't be to any sane person)
NickB79
Nov 2015
#50
Wow. No response to the science so you play the race, class and gender cards all at once?
GliderGuider
Nov 2015
#55