Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: The climate fact no one will admit: 2 °C warming is inevitable [View all]NickB79
(20,400 posts)50. What impacts just humans isn't all that matters (at least, it shouldn't be to any sane person)
After all, you shouldn't call something a "massive global impact" if it doesn't actually, you know, "impact" people's lives.
So, if it doesn't impact a large number of people's lives in the short term, it doesn't rise to a massive, global impact?
By that logic, many repulsive things could be done to the environment that would be permissible using your mindset.
Shoot every African elephant on the planet for ivory, it doesn't affect 99% of the people on this planet in the short term! But it would cause huge, negative changes to the African ecosystem they're a part of and wipe out a 50-million year old phyla of life.
Harpoon the last whale in the ocean, it doesn't affect 99% of the people on this planet in the short term! But it would have hugely detrimental impacts on the ocean biosphere, and wipe out a 50-million year old phyla.
Clear-cut the Alberta forests for tar sands and build the Keystone XL pipeline across farmland, it doesn't affect 99% of the people on this planet! But we'd be spoiling millions of square kilometers of land in the process.
Effects to the planet's biosphere, cryosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere can indeed be massive and global, even if they have no immediate impact on human lives, for the simple fact that there is far more to the planet than human life. Indeed, some of the things I listed would actually IMPROVE millions of lives in the short term. Shooting elephants would generate massive profits for hunters and protect farmer's crops. Whaling to extinction would employ millions in the short term.
However, it also implies that there is no intrinsic value in the natural world beyond what human civilization can get out of it for economic growth.
Frankly, that's a position I've only seen the far right take, and it is sickening.
But even with the "small" changes we've already enacted to the planet, we are seeing lives impacted:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/may/29/1
Global warming causes 300,000 deaths a year, says Kofi Annan thinktank
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/27/climate-change-kills-400-000-a-year-new-report-reveals.html
Climate Change Kills 400,000 a Year, New Report Reveals
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121032/map-climate-change-kills-more-people-worldwide-terrorism
Obama Is Right: Climate Change Kills More People Than Terrorism
Like I said in my initial post to this thread: That's the result of "only" 0.8C of warming. You want to gamble and see what 2C does?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In IPCC-speak, "There is at least a 66% chance that a 2C target is too optimistic."
GliderGuider
Nov 2015
#3
Basically the IPCC, their emasculated scientists, the politicians and media of the world.
GliderGuider
Nov 2015
#10
Do you think that people are generally beginning to understand that >2C is now unavoidable?
GliderGuider
Nov 2015
#12
OK, how about this: Americans Largely Unconcerned About Climate Change, Survey Finds
GliderGuider
Nov 2015
#16
Considering China's been busted for consuming far more coal than they say they do . .
hatrack
Nov 2015
#23
The only problem is that you intentionally ignore what researchers are telling us
NickB79
Nov 2015
#28
Thank you , but no belief system is going to make watching my children die easier
sue4e3
Nov 2015
#37
What "most people" think is largely irrelevant given how little the average person knows of science
NickB79
Nov 2015
#44
What impacts just humans isn't all that matters (at least, it shouldn't be to any sane person)
NickB79
Nov 2015
#50
Wow. No response to the science so you play the race, class and gender cards all at once?
GliderGuider
Nov 2015
#55