Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's locked in... haikugal Nov 2015 #1
Two degrees is optimistic Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #2
In IPCC-speak, "There is at least a 66% chance that a 2C target is too optimistic." GliderGuider Nov 2015 #3
The science dfreakout was in the mid and late 80's Scootaloo Nov 2015 #6
I'd double that, based on paul ofnoclique Nov 2015 #20
Yes, and when that becomes widely acknowledged, I look forward to ... Jim__ Nov 2015 #4
Yep. GreenPartyVoter Nov 2015 #52
What do you mean “no one will admit” it? OKIsItJustMe Nov 2015 #5
Basically the IPCC, their emasculated scientists, the politicians and media of the world. GliderGuider Nov 2015 #10
The climate policy narrative for a dangerously warming world OKIsItJustMe Nov 2015 #11
Do you think that people are generally beginning to understand that >2C is now unavoidable? GliderGuider Nov 2015 #12
(Statistically speaking) “the people I know” make a poor sample OKIsItJustMe Nov 2015 #13
OK, how about this: Americans Largely Unconcerned About Climate Change, Survey Finds GliderGuider Nov 2015 #16
I think you've nailed it Boomer Nov 2015 #30
So did you. GliderGuider Nov 2015 #32
The actual report… OKIsItJustMe Nov 2015 #7
Aha, so *that* is the sound of inevitability phantom power Nov 2015 #8
fareed zakaria 2007 Mosby Nov 2015 #9
Ultimately this is a self-correcting problem pscot Nov 2015 #14
My standard answer to "What do we need to do to fix it?" is "Wait..." nt GliderGuider Nov 2015 #15
World can still stop globe from warming more than 2 C, experts tell UN mollyonthefeeds Nov 2015 #17
Considering China's been busted for consuming far more coal than they say they do . . hatrack Nov 2015 #23
Given China's coal consumption revelation, I think 2036 is optimistic NickB79 Nov 2015 #18
17%% more than they admitted... GliderGuider Nov 2015 #19
I don't think anyone actually knows LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #21
Lying or deluded - or they are a politician. GliderGuider Nov 2015 #22
So let's just keep on fumbling and lying and dissembling, right? hatrack Nov 2015 #24
Sorry if reality bothers you... LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #27
And we're already seeing massive, global climate impacts at "only" 0.8C so far NickB79 Nov 2015 #25
Here is the problem LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #26
The only problem is that you intentionally ignore what researchers are telling us NickB79 Nov 2015 #28
I'm not intentionally ignoring anything LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #40
No, you're really not are you? GliderGuider Nov 2015 #41
You misunderstand the nature of the dispute LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #42
Why not just accept that as someone else's opinion? GliderGuider Nov 2015 #43
What makes you think I don't? LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #45
Why do you care what other people think? GliderGuider Nov 2015 #46
You do care what other people think LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #48
Keep telling yourself that. GliderGuider Nov 2015 #49
How about the Arctic ice sheet death spiral we all get to observe? NickB79 Nov 2015 #29
Sadly, it's not enough for most people Boomer Nov 2015 #31
I have made myself literally sick to my very core over the state sue4e3 Nov 2015 #33
For your own sake, practice detachment Boomer Nov 2015 #34
Good luck we'll both need it, Sincerely sue4e3 Nov 2015 #35
I would like to strongly support Boomer's suggestion about detachment. GliderGuider Nov 2015 #36
Thank you , but no belief system is going to make watching my children die easier sue4e3 Nov 2015 #37
You're welcome. GliderGuider Nov 2015 #38
Lowest maximum ice extent on record... LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #39
What "most people" think is largely irrelevant given how little the average person knows of science NickB79 Nov 2015 #44
Question LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #47
What impacts just humans isn't all that matters (at least, it shouldn't be to any sane person) NickB79 Nov 2015 #50
Let me guess LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #51
Wow. No response to the science so you play the race, class and gender cards all at once? GliderGuider Nov 2015 #55
Yup LouisvilleDem Nov 2015 #56
Thank you! (n/t) Nihil Nov 2015 #54
this is completely confusing and deniers are taking advantage. SleeplessinSoCal Nov 2015 #53
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The climate fact no one w...»Reply #51