Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
17. You're right, it probably is, at least for 35 MPH.
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 02:12 PM
Mar 2012

I was ballparking it based on battery-to-wheels efficiency numbers for dedicated electric vehicles. The Tesla Roadster is officially rated at around 265 watt-hours per mile, for instance (although in real-world use it's actually somewhat more efficient, capable of running as low as 194 watt-hours per mile under ideal conditions) and the Nissan leaf is rated at 242 watt-hours per mile (again, potentially going as low as 191).

My assumption was also that a converted car is going to be slightly less efficient on electricity than a dedicated EV, because of not as much attention being paid to the weight of the vehicle, and also less efficiency in a drive train built on the assumption of running off a gas engine rather than an electric motor. So I pegged it at the higher end of the potential estimates.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»You can drive an electric...»Reply #17