Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,094 posts)
9. Really? I would guess that the unenlightened really have no idea about Chinese mining...
Mon Nov 23, 2015, 01:11 PM
Nov 2015

...practices, and further, that they couldn't care less about them. Actually, I'm not guessing, I know.

To a man, a woman, 100% of these people are clueless. To a man, to a woman, 100% of these people are unfamiliar with the contents of either the primary scientific literature or even monographs and textbooks.

The plant's scale, reported to be "the world's largest" by the OP also tells reams and reams about the grotesque failure of the solar industry, in as much as the plant will produce 5 "gigawatts" per year - typical of the lie that peak capacity has anything to do with energy production. In reality on planet earth, among scientifically informed people, the capacity utilization of a plant is what counts. For solar, in most places, this is roughly ten percent. This means the "world's largest plant" - assuredly a toxic nightmare - at 5 GW is the equivalent of building one small 500 MW gas plant per year.

Given that world release of dangerous deadly fossil fuel waste is at the highest level ever observed, this is clearly trivial.

Note that the solar cells will not shut a single gas plant, instead they will depend on gas plants to back them up, since they're not only toxic, but they are unreliable.

Moreover, the Chinese plant, not operating under the environmental restrictions of Western law, will serve to drive Western plants out of business, meaning the "world's largest plant" will simply replace the economic failures like Solyndra and other solar plants.

Unquestionably though, given the low educational level, lack of humanity, dreaminess, obliviousness and lack of true environmental concern given to the anti-nuke purveyors of this on going tragedy, there will indeed be lots of "huzzahs!" for this crap. This ignorance and indifference is why the rise in greenhouse gases is accelerating and not declining.

Thanks for your feedback. If we don't have a chance, have a nice bourgeois Thanksgiving holiday.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This should exacerbate the heavy metal pollution in China's crop land. NNadir Nov 2015 #1
No, it shouldn't - in fact, just the opposite kristopher Nov 2015 #3
Really? I would guess that the unenlightened really have no idea about Chinese mining... NNadir Nov 2015 #9
Interesting choice of arguments kristopher Nov 2015 #19
Wow! As always, we have another case of someone knowing nothing about nuclear energy... NNadir Nov 2015 #22
As usual you write a wall of nonsensical text to divert from not addressing the issue kristopher Nov 2015 #23
Um...um...um...yeah...yeah... NNadir Nov 2015 #37
This is what moving away from fossil fuels (and nuclear) looks like kristopher Nov 2015 #38
Just to clear things up, this plant WILL NOT produce and electricity. Binkie The Clown Nov 2015 #11
Exactly dumbcat Nov 2015 #14
Are you saying you expect your panels to suddenly go kaput in 3 years? kristopher Nov 2015 #16
No, I don't dumbcat Nov 2015 #17
There's no problem with my reading comprehension kristopher Nov 2015 #18
And that is exactly the problem with your reading comprehension dumbcat Nov 2015 #20
I get the idea from the words you write. kristopher Nov 2015 #21
You've been doing this for 25 years and don't seem to understand the basics of the warranty? Finishline42 Nov 2015 #34
I stand corrected. I read that 10 yr figure a long time ago, Binkie The Clown Nov 2015 #25
What a load of crap. kristopher Nov 2015 #28
So when somebody points out an error I made, I should do what? Stand my ground Binkie The Clown Nov 2015 #30
You didn't make an "error", you made a deliberate false statement kristopher Nov 2015 #32
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Orrex Nov 2015 #36
I used to use a 10 year estimate dumbcat Nov 2015 #35
2 million homes each year. 50 years to minimally finish the US. Festivito Nov 2015 #2
More like 1,666,666 homes per year, every year the factory is operating kristopher Nov 2015 #4
The number of houses that 5GW/Year represents. eom Festivito Nov 2015 #5
You might want to learn what a "GW" is first. kristopher Nov 2015 #6
Oops. Monday. I was treating 5GW-year as power, not 5GW per year as energy. Festivito Nov 2015 #7
Yeah... Oooops... Riiiiiiiiight.... More like 1.67 million homes per year. kristopher Nov 2015 #8
{Sigh} This is really sad dumbcat Nov 2015 #10
They understand. kristopher Nov 2015 #12
What you just said dumbcat Nov 2015 #13
It follows from the words you typed. kristopher Nov 2015 #15
The answer is simple. Binkie The Clown Nov 2015 #24
You are right, it is simple kristopher Nov 2015 #26
The truth will set you free... Binkie The Clown Nov 2015 #27
I don't have a problem dealing with the truth kristopher Nov 2015 #29
There comes a time in a discussion when you realize that Binkie The Clown Nov 2015 #31
Playing the innocent lamb after trying to pass off RW falsehoods on a liberal forum? kristopher Nov 2015 #33
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»China's Tongwei Group Pla...»Reply #9