Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
1. Now I understand the
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 04:41 PM
Nov 2015

"Breakthrough Prize" a bit better:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/11/06/science/breakthrough-prize-winners-2016.html

On Nov 8th in CA, a committee funded by an overlapping set of billionaires handed out seven prizes of $3 million apiece in physics, math, life sciences, and a few other categories.

I'd snip a few paragraphs from the NYT article above, but all I get now is a paywall because I must have exceeded my free monthly quota.

Anyway, a few tens of millions is chump change for them, but your article suggests they may plan cleverly to make back that money, and much more.

Think of the thousands of prize entries they must get each year from the best minds in the world, and think of how their prize money must influence those minds away from pure science to applied science. The billionaires could be trawling for early investment ideas, by the thousands. I'd like to see the footnotes on intellectual property rights in those Breakthrough Prize application forms.

In other words the BP may not entirely be philanthropic in nature.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Billionaires create new i...»Reply #1