Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
14. The pic is all over a number of enviromental blogs
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 01:30 PM
Dec 2015

and they directly state or imply that this happened in Oklahoma,

For example:

(PICTURED ABOVE: one of 2,547 earthquakes caused by Fracking in Oklahoma since 2009)

http://omitlimitation.com/2014/07/09/new-study-links-fracking-with-earthquakes/

The photo wasn't licensed since a properly licensed photo has copyright data embedded, whereas such data is stripped out of this photo. The original source for the photo appear to be this site, documenting damage caused by an earthquake in Japan on October 23, 2004. The road was damage by a landslide.

http://www.geerassociation.org/GEER_Post%20EQ%20Reports/Niigata-ken_2004/November2.html

No one was talking about fracking in Oklahoma in 2004. Again, it is improper to use a photo in a news story without attribution and in a manner that is deceptive or misleading.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm sure when Hillary is Fracker-in-Chief she'll come up with a solution. Scuba Dec 2015 #1
+1 darkangel218 Dec 2015 #13
Where was that picture taken? -none Dec 2015 #2
The cable used to protect yesphan Dec 2015 #5
"National Security"? You mean, potentially affecting the flow of oil & gas? hatrack Dec 2015 #3
Misleading Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #4
The tag is from a Asian country. -none Dec 2015 #6
Thanks, Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #7
But whatever... -none Dec 2015 #8
The terrain struck me as very Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #9
It still depicts something which could happen darkangel218 Dec 2015 #10
Yes, but the writer does NOT identify the actual location Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #11
Maybe they found a pic with the licence cropped? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #12
The pic is all over a number of enviromental blogs Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #14
Ahh...I see what you mean. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #15
I think mis-using this photo damages the credibility of the story. mackdaddy Dec 2015 #19
Exactly! Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #25
Willful intent? kristopher Dec 2015 #16
Well, I tracked the pic down Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #17
Yes, and how does that support your assumption of malicious intent? kristopher Dec 2015 #18
Please show me where I used the word "malicious". Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #20
"willful intent to mislead" kristopher Dec 2015 #21
"Willful" and "malicious" are not synonymous Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #22
You accused the person of lying - that's malicious. kristopher Dec 2015 #23
Don't flatter yourself Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #24
Perhaps you need a bit more study... kristopher Dec 2015 #27
I said, Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #28
You said a lot of meaningless crap... kristopher Dec 2015 #33
Probably a sotck image, but Oklahoma dose have some steep terrain. Images of Falls Creek Oklahoma Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #26
The image is from a 6.8 earthquake Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #29
Stock footage then. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #30
No. They swiped it from a structural engineering group's Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #32
You really don't get it, do you? kristopher Dec 2015 #34
You don't get it Kelvin Mace Dec 2015 #36
Poor little feller... kristopher Dec 2015 #37
Here's a segment from RMS 2naSalit Dec 2015 #31
Thank you. kristopher Dec 2015 #35
You're welcome... 2naSalit Dec 2015 #38
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Another Earthquake Hits O...»Reply #14