> Why don't you stop being so rude.
You are the one who is repeating lies (e.g., in the subject line of .7).
> You asked what the point of post 2 was and I told you even though I would have thought it was clear.
No, in .6 I asked what the point of .5 was (i.e., the post that I replied to) as I had been hoping for
an answer to my previous question ("Why do you insist on spamming the shit out of me even when
I'm agreeing with you?"
but was being diverted by evasions.
> Your rants against natural gas serve no purpose ...
Strawman: The statement that "the gas industry has been lobbying heavily, arguing
that gas offers a cheap alternative to renewables, despite being a fossil fuel" came
straight from the OP article (that you posted).
My comment on that extract ("Yeah, we see that a *lot* around the globe ..." is in no way
or form a "rant against natural gas".
> You can't get rid of natural gas or coal by building more nuclear.
Strawman: I didn't claim that.
So ... for another patient attempt to get an answer, why are you being so negative and
aggressive towards me when I am in agreement with your OP?
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read