Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

9. Your beliefs are false.

Mon Dec 28, 2015, 02:45 AM

Dec 2015

Last edited Mon Dec 28, 2015, 12:50 PM - Edit history (1)

And your reasoning suffers severe deficiencies.

We've known for more than 3 decades from study preceding the 1992 Rio Earth Summit that renewables with present and near term technology can, indeed, provide the power for modern culture.

If you understood the problem better you'd know that nuclear and renewables are, by nature of their operational attributes and the consequent economics, not compatible.

The fact that those like you and Hansen choose to base your conclusions on manufactured bullshit from the nuclear industry (as it tries to corner the quadrillion dollar global energy market for the next hundred years) instead of actually listening to the independent people who have spent their lives dissecting and analyzing the human use of energy systems is what makes you similar to climate deniers.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

25 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Support for Nuclear == Denial [View all] LouisvilleDem Dec 2015 OP

I've had this argument so many times, I needed this article. Thank you! Gregorian Dec 2015 #1

It's evidence of the formation of camps in the environmental movement GliderGuider Dec 2015 #2

Nuclear isn't as carbon-free as we would like AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #3

You could try opening a scientific paper on the subject of LCA... NNadir Dec 2015 #6

Nicely stated. eom whitefordmd Dec 2015 #7

I think the enemy is a delusional regulatory environment cprise Dec 2015 #4

It is denial - nuclear isn't needed at all. bananas Dec 2015 #5

What if you are wrong? LouisvilleDem Dec 2015 #8

Your beliefs are false. kristopher Dec 2015 #9

Your reasoning suffers severe deficiencies LouisvilleDem Jan 2016 #10

Nope. kristopher Jan 2016 #11

Study != Proof LouisvilleDem Jan 2016 #12

No, he can't. kristopher Jan 2016 #13

You don't get it LouisvilleDem Jan 2016 #14

No, it isn't different. kristopher Jan 2016 #15

Response LouisvilleDem Jan 2016 #16

And that returns us to the "denier" label kristopher Jan 2016 #18

Economics of nuclear power and climate change mitigation policies OKIsItJustMe Jan 2016 #17

What - specifically - is your point? kristopher Jan 2016 #19

You asked for science OKIsItJustMe Jan 2016 #20

And how do you interpret that statement... kristopher Jan 2016 #21

Well, interpreting the statement would be in the context in which was written. OKIsItJustMe Jan 2016 #22

"those probably will not be renewable...." kristopher Jan 2016 #23

As you can see, renewables do not play much of a role OKIsItJustMe Jan 2016 #24

So you insist on ignoring real world events, eh? kristopher Jan 2016 #25