Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,875 posts)
17. Economics of nuclear power and climate change mitigation policies
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:56 PM
Jan 2016
http://www.pnas.org/content/109/42/16805.full
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Economics of nuclear power and climate change mitigation policies[/font]





Edited by M. Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, and approved August 27, 2012 (received for review January 31, 2012)



[font size=4]Conclusion[/font]

[font size=3]We present an assessment of the economics of nuclear and climate policies including decommissioning of existing nuclear power plants. Our analysis indicates that the economic and energy-related impacts of strong climate policies are more significant than the impact of restrictive nuclear power policies, both in the short term and in the longer term. The need to reduce emissions interferes with fossil energy markets and leads to significant reductions in the use of coal, oil, and gas. Additional nuclear power is of only moderate importance for achieving strong emission reductions.

Restricting new investments in nuclear power mainly has impacts in the medium term. Decommissioning existing nuclear power capacities induces a shortfall of electricity production that is partially compensated by natural gas power. The new-start scenarios suggest that new nuclear power capacity can also be an important means to fill the remaining power production gap. If this alternative is also abandoned, coal—in the absence of a carbon budget—or a broad mix of other alternatives is applied if a carbon budget is in place. Renewable energy seems not to be a prominent solution approach to fill the shortfall if nuclear power plants are decommissioned. In all scenarios with decommissioning, approximately one third of the total shortfall is met by demand reductions.

…[/font][/font]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Support for Nuclear == Denial [View all] LouisvilleDem Dec 2015 OP
I've had this argument so many times, I needed this article. Thank you! Gregorian Dec 2015 #1
It's evidence of the formation of camps in the environmental movement GliderGuider Dec 2015 #2
Nuclear isn't as carbon-free as we would like AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #3
You could try opening a scientific paper on the subject of LCA... NNadir Dec 2015 #6
Nicely stated. eom whitefordmd Dec 2015 #7
I think the enemy is a delusional regulatory environment cprise Dec 2015 #4
It is denial - nuclear isn't needed at all. bananas Dec 2015 #5
What if you are wrong? LouisvilleDem Dec 2015 #8
Your beliefs are false. kristopher Dec 2015 #9
Your reasoning suffers severe deficiencies LouisvilleDem Jan 2016 #10
Nope. kristopher Jan 2016 #11
Study != Proof LouisvilleDem Jan 2016 #12
No, he can't. kristopher Jan 2016 #13
You don't get it LouisvilleDem Jan 2016 #14
No, it isn't different. kristopher Jan 2016 #15
Response LouisvilleDem Jan 2016 #16
And that returns us to the "denier" label kristopher Jan 2016 #18
Economics of nuclear power and climate change mitigation policies OKIsItJustMe Jan 2016 #17
What - specifically - is your point? kristopher Jan 2016 #19
You asked for science OKIsItJustMe Jan 2016 #20
And how do you interpret that statement... kristopher Jan 2016 #21
Well, interpreting the statement would be in the context in which was written. OKIsItJustMe Jan 2016 #22
"those probably will not be renewable...." kristopher Jan 2016 #23
As you can see, renewables do not play much of a role OKIsItJustMe Jan 2016 #24
So you insist on ignoring real world events, eh? kristopher Jan 2016 #25
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Support for Nuclear == De...»Reply #17