Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
18. Outstanding question.
Fri Mar 16, 2012, 02:43 PM
Mar 2012

We have alternatives for all carbon fuels. We just need to cut the umbilical cord.

The flow of events should be have two currents.
First the widescale deployment of renewables is having the predicted outcome of driving down prices rapidly. As we go through the transition process in the advanced economies, in developing nations (where grid infrastructure is non-existent or weak) distributed generation is already economically preferable at the just-above-subsistence levels of society. Between the two, there is a huge market opening up for advancing the supply chain and manufacturing base for renewables.

That ensures a continued decline in costs.

Second, by lowering the stranglehold of entrenched energy in the developed nations on the political process we create more opportunities for global action in the arena of the other policy tools that have heretofore been of limited value. The increased use of policies like renewable targets and FITs (my favorite) and the imposition of a global carbon tax become real possibilities when the balance of control over the energy system within the first world shifts away from carbon.

That is a cycle which ends carbon.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»UK opposes a 2030 renewab...»Reply #18