Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
2. This is about right, Pennsylvania was mostly cleared cut by 1900, and is now mostly forests.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 11:48 PM
Feb 2016

In fact over the last 20 to 30 years deer hunters have been complaining, the Forest has shifted from Second growth to mature forests and deer are NOT a mature forest creature, it likes second growth. Turkeys are the main animal in mature forests (along with Squirrels).

Thus to took about 60 years to return to mature forests. Now these new mature forests are NOT as tall as the trees in Cook Forest State Park (one of the few virgin forests in Pennsylvania, it is the result of two large forest owners NOT knowing where their border was so neither one cut any of those trees, then Governor Pinchot, Governor of Pennsylvania in the 1920s, managed to arrange for the state to buy it, through technically was purchased by the Republican Governor of PA between Pinchots two terms as Governor).

http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/stateparks/findapark/cookforest/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cook_Forest_State_Park

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gifford_Pinchot

Now, Pennsylvania has been harvesting these forests over the last 20 to 30 years, but has refused to permit clear cutting on most (but not all) of the recovered forests (The Game Commission permits the most clear cutting, for it opens up lands to small game, but then over the years the clear cuts turn into secondary forests that deer like and then mature forests. Game Commission Clear cuts are known NOT to be that extensive, for most small game do NOT need a large clear area AND the native animals to Pennsylvania generally like Cleared areas next to forests, so the Game Commission makes sure both types of land exists on their lands.

Allegheny National Forest is also being logged, and it is the only profitable logging operation run by the Forest Service (all of the rest of the National Forests, the Forest Service has to build roads with tax payer's money, but the Cherry in Allegheny Forest is extremely valuable. One story I read was German furniture makers pay a premium for Cherry out of that National Forest and get picky as to the township the tree is from. Again it was mostly clear cut by 1900 but starting in the 1960s it had recovered.

The second set of land undergoing maturity are former farms abandoned in the 1930s. These were homes to people who worked on larger farms, but with mechanization of farming those jobs disappeared and they had to abandon their marginal farm to find work in the cities. Most of these farms were just self sufficient farms, crops were planned for family use but not for resale. Most were NOT even worth being purchased by larger farms for farming when they were abandoned, required to much manual labor to farm. These were abandoned mostly in the 1930s and into the 1950s as the people on those marginal farms moved to the cities. These farms returned to scrub then secondary growth and now 60 to 70 years later becoming mature forests. Most trees on such farms tend to grow faster then on the hillsides of Western Pennsylvania but still take 60-to 40 years to mature, and when it comes to timber them, most timbering takes place when they are 80 to 100 years old. Thus the clear cut woods of 1900 are being re timbered today, these abandoned farmlands are next.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Cause for hope: Secondary...»Reply #2