Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(14,733 posts)

2. That's what I was thinking. The real solution is not to HAVE 9-10 billion people.

Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:12 AM

Feb 2016

Did my part, didn't reproduce. More people need to do the same. The 'quiverful' movement is an obscenity.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Nitrogen Problem [View all] progressoid Feb 2016 OP

The problem I see... NeoGreen Feb 2016 #3

Can I ask where that quote is from? nt NickB79 Feb 2016 #5

From the character... NeoGreen Feb 2016 #10

Fixing Nitrogen is late 1800 technology happyslug Feb 2016 #4

That used to be a good idea but now? Not so much ... Nihil Feb 2016 #11

Oh, I don’t know OKIsItJustMe Feb 2016 #14

Spark fixation of nitrogen was never a viable process. NNadir Feb 2016 #16

The title of your post borders on an oxymoron. NNadir Feb 2016 #18

Please better define "an evidence based approach". kristopher Feb 2016 #8

Ask the author. progressoid Feb 2016 #9

Screw that load of GMO apologia and address the real problem. Nihil Feb 2016 #12

Good luck with that. progressoid Feb 2016 #15